This is a good article. Click here for more information.

Russulaceae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Russulaceae
Russula emetica 117475.jpg
Russula emetica
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Russulales
Family: Russulaceae
Lotsy (1907)[1]
Type genus
Russula
Pers. (1796)
Genera

Boidinia
Gloeopeniophorella
Lactarius1
Lactifluus
Multifurca
Pseudoxenasma
Russula2
1including Arcangeliella, Gastrolactarius, and Zelleromyces
2including Cystangium, Gymnomyces, Elasmomyces, Martellia, and Macowanites

Synonyms[2][3]
  • Asterosporaceae Moreau (1954) (nom. illeg.)
  • Elasmomycetaceae Locq. ex Pegler & T.W.K.Young (1979)
  • Lactariaceae Gäumann (1926)

The Russulaceae are a diverse family of fungi in the order Russulales, with roughly 1,900 known species and a worldwide distribution. They comprise the brittlegills and the milk-caps, popular mushroom-forming fungi that include some edible species. These gilled mushrooms are characterised by the easily breaking flesh of their fruitbodies. In addition to these typical agaricoid forms, the family contains species with laterally stiped (pleurotoid), closed (secotioid or gasteroid), and crust-like (corticioid) fruitbodies.

Study of molecular phylogenetics has significantly changed ideas about relationships within the family. It demonstrated the close affinities between species with very different fruitbody types and the existence of distinct lineages in the supposedly well-characterised milk-cap genus Lactarius.

The mushroom genera Lactarius, Lactifluus, Multifurca, and Russula are an important group of root-symbiotic ectomycorrhizal fungi in various forests and shrublands around the world, and are also involved in other types of mycorrhiza. The crust-forming genera Boidinia, Gloeopeniophorella, and Pseudoxenasma have basal positions in the family and are wood-decay fungi.

Systematics and taxonomy[edit]

The name Russulaceae was first validly used in 1907 by Dutch botanist Johannes Paulus Lotsy,[4] who included three genera: Russula, Lactarius, and the now-obsolete Russulina. He emphasised features such as the granular flesh, thick gills, the presence of milky hyphae and rounded cells (sphaerocytes), and spiny spores.[1] A prior usage of the name by French mycologist Ernst Roze in 1876[5] does not meet the requirements for valid publication.[4]

Synonyms of Russulaceae include: Ernst Albert Gäumann's Lactariaceae (1926), Fernand Moreau's Asterosporaceae (1953),[2] and David Pegler and Thomas Young's Elasmomycetaceae (1979). The latter family was proposed to contain species with statismosporic (non-forcibly discharged) and symmetric spores, including the gasteroid genera Elasmomyces, Gymnomyces, Martellia, and Zelleromyces. Calonge and Martín reduced the Elasmomycetaceae to synonymy with the Russulaceae when molecular analysis confirmed the close genetic relationship between the gasteroid and agaricoid genera.[3]

Placement of the family[edit]

Historically, the gilled mushrooms of the family Russulaceae were classified with other gilled species in the order Agaricales,[6] but microscopical studies of spore and fruitbody flesh features raised the possibility that they were more closely related with certain "lower fungi" presenting nongilled, crust-like fruitbodies.[2][7][8] Later, the use of molecular phylogenetics confirmed that these morphologically diverse fungi form a distinct lineage, first termed "russuloid clade"[9][10] and today classified as order Russulales in the class Agaricomycetes.[11] The family's sister group within the order appear to be the crust-like Gloeocystidiellaceae.[12]

Internal systematics[edit]






Lactarius



Multifurca




Russula




Lactifluus




Boidinia



Gloeopeniophorella



Pseudoxenasma



Phylogeny of the Russulaceae; dashed lines indicate uncertain placement.[9][12][13][14]

A 2008 molecular phylogenetic study clarified the relationships among the mushroom-forming species of the family.[14] The authors demonstrated that there are four distinct lineages of gilled mushrooms, which led to the description of Multifurca as a new genus separated from Russula[14] and the segregation of Lactifluus from Lactarius.[15][16]

Genera with closed fruitbodies within the family are form taxa instead of natural groups: Arcangeliella, Gastrolactarius, and Zelleromyces are phylogenetically part of Lactarius, while Cystangium, Elasmomyces, Gymnomyces, Macowanites, and Martellia belong to Russula.[3][15] Nevertheless, some of these genera names are still in use, as many of the concerned species have not yet formally been synonymised with Lactarius or Russula.[17]

The crust-like genera Boidinia, Gloeopeniophorella, and Pseudoxenasma, formerly placed in the Corticiaceae or Gloeocystidiellaceae, are also classified in the Russulaceae and are basal to the clade of mushroom-forming species described above.[12][17] Studies failed however to clearly circumscribe and place these genera within the family so far.[9][12][13] Boidinia in its current extent is polyphyletic, with some species not falling into the Russulaceae.[9]

Species diversity[edit]

Altogether, the Russulaceae comprise around 1,900 accepted species.[17] Russula is by far the largest genus with ca. 1100 species, Lactarius has ca. 550, Lactifluus ca. 120, Boidinia 13, Multifurca 6, Gloeopeniophorella 6, and Pseudoxenasma 1 species.[17][18] Closed-fruitbody species not yet synonymised with Lactarius or Russula (see above) account for some 150 species.[17]

New species in the Russulaceae continue to be described from various regions, such as from the USA,[19] Guyana,[20] Brazil,[21] Patagonia,[22] Togo,[23] Sri Lanka,[24] or Thailand.[24] It has been estimated that the real number of Russula species in North America alone (currently around 400 described) might be as high as 2000.[25] Cryptic species may increase true diversity: Some morphologically well-defined species, especially in Lactifluus, have been shown to encompass in fact several phylogenetic species.[26][27][28]

Description[edit]

Macroscopic characteristics[edit]

Broken stipe of a gilled mushroom with brittle flesh
Lactifluus vellereus (Russulaceae)
Comparison of brittle flesh texture in Russulaceae and the more fibrous flesh found in most other fungi

Three major types of fruitbodies occur in the Russulaceae: agaricoid and pleurotoid forms with a cap, gills, and a stipe; forms with closed (gasteroid) or partially closed (secotioid) fruitbodies, and corticioid, crust-like forms.

The agaricoid species in Lactarius, Lactifluus, Multifurca, and Russula are readily distinguished from other gilled mushrooms by the consistency of their flesh, which is granular, brittle and breaks easily, somewhat like a piece of chalk.[1][29] Russulaceae never have a volva,[29] but a partial veil can be found in some tropical species.[30][31] Gills are adnate to decurrent, and the colour of the spore print ranges from white to ochre or orange[14][32] (with the brown-spored Lactarius chromospermus as an exception[33]).

Caps can be quite colourful, especially in Russula;[32] their size ranges from 2–17 mm diameter in Russula campinensis[34] to 30 cm (12 in) in Lactifluus vellereus.[32] Zonate, i.e. concentrically ringed, caps occur in all Multifurca[14] and several Lactarius species.[32] Laterally stiped (pleurotoid) fruitbodies exist in some, mainly tropical Lactifluus and Russula species.[34][35][36][37] Taste is an important character in many species, with some tasting mild and others being somewhat to very acrid.[32] A conspicuous feature of the "milk-caps" in Lactarius and Lactifluus, and Multifurca furcata, is the milk-like latex their fruitbodies exude when bruised.[14][29]

The secotioid or gasteroid species in Lactarius and Russula are derived from agaricoid forms.[14][38] Secotioid species still have a stipe but the cap does not open fully, while in gasteroid species, fruitbodies are completely closed and the stipe is reduced; in both cases, the spore-bearing structure is made up of deformed, convoluted gills that are more or less crowded and anastomosed.[38] These closed-fruitbody species represent a continuum of secotioid to gasteroid, above-ground (epigeous) to below-ground (hypogeous) fruitbodies, with spores forcibly discharged or not.[24][38][39] Secotioid or gasteroid Lactarius exude latex just like their agaricoid relatives.[3][24][39]

The corticioid species of Boidinia, Gloeopeniophorella, and Pseudoxenasma develop crust-like fruitbodies with a smooth, porous, or flaky surface and grow on tree logs or dead branches.[9][40][41][42]

Morphological variety of Russulaceae
Mushroom fruitbody cut in half, showing reduced gills and half-closed cap
Russula crustosa, an agaricoid species 
Two round, closed, orange mushrooms placed on a rock, one of them cut in half, exposing convoluted gills that exude some latex.
Arcangeliella crassa, a secotioid species, phylogenetically belonging in Lactarius 
Picture showing small, laterally stiped mushrooms on a mat of mycelium developing at the stem of a leaf
Zelleromyces cinnabarinus, a gasteroid species likewise part of Lactarius phylogenetically 
Picture showing white crusts on pieces of dead wood
A French Guianese Lactifluus with a pleurotoid habit, more common in tropical Russulaceae 
A white mushroom growing on the ground, with green spots on the cap surface
Pseudoxenasma verrucisporum, a corticioid (crust-like) species 

Microscopic characteristics[edit]

Microscopical picture showing round shapes with rough, dark blue ridged textures
Spores of Lactarius rubidus, showing ornamentation with a blue, amyloid stain reaction that is typical for Russulaceae

All Russulaceae, including the corticioid species, are characterised by spherical to elliptic basidiospores with a faint to very distinct (e.g. warty, spiny, or crested) ornamentation that stains bluish-black with Melzer's reagent (an amyloid stain reaction).[9][29] Basidia (spore-bearing cells) are usually club-shaped and four-spored.[43] Russulaceae species do not have clamp connections.[44]

Characteristic cells with an oily content (gloeocystidia) are found in the hymenium. In Russulaceae, these show a positive colour reaction when treated with sulfoaldehydes (sulfovanillin is mostly used).[9][29] They are also present in the hyphal sheath of ectomycorrhizal roots colonised by Russulaceae.[13]

The feature responsible for the brittle fruitbody structure in the mushroom-forming species are globular cells, called sphaerocytes or sphaerocysts, that compose the flesh (trama) alongside the usual hyphae.[29] Sometimes, these cells are clustered in "rosettes", and their position and arrangement differs among genera.[29]

Another particular trama cell type are lactiferous hyphae (also lactifers). These are hyphae carrying the "milk" or "latex" exuded by the milk-caps; they react positively with sulfoaldehydes, form an abundantly branched system in the trama and end as pseudocystidia in the hymenium.[29] In general, only Lactarius, Lactifluus and Multifurca furcata possess lactifers.[14] In Russula, similar hyphae can sometimes be observed in the trama, but these are not as abundantly branched as real lactifers and do not extend into the hymenium as pseudocystidia.[29] This traditional distinction line between the "milk-caps" and Russula is however less evident in some tropical species presenting intermediate states.[35]

Genera distinction[edit]

View showing cap surface of an ochre mushroom with darker, concentrical rings
Unidentified Multifurca species
Zonate caps are a feature of several species of Russulaceae in Lactarius and Multifurca.
  • Boidinia: corticioid; loose texture; surface smooth, with pores, or flaky; spores spherical with spiny to warty ornamentation;[9][40] note that the genus is polyphyletic and needs to be redefined.[9]
  • Gloeopeniophorella: corticioid; surface almost smooth; hyphae without clamp connections; thick-walled cystidia (metuloids) and gloeocystidia present; spores with wrinkled (rugose) ornamentation.[42]
  • Lactarius: agaricoid or gasteroid; exuding latex*; caps sometimes zonate, viscose or glutinate, but never annulate; rarely thick-walled cells in cuticles of the cap (pileipellis) and the stipe (stipitipellis) and sphaerocytes in the gills.[14][16]
  • Lactifluus: agaricoid or pleurotoid; exuding latex*; caps never zonate, viscose or glutinate, but sometimes annulate; thick-walled cells in cap and stipe cuticles; often sphaerocytes in the gill trama.[14][16]
  • Multifurca: agaricoid; caps zonate (also visible in cut through trama); gills regularly forked; only M. furcata exuding latex; spore print orange; spores very small; microscopical trama and hymenium features very variable.[14]
  • Pseudoxenasma: corticioid; wax-like texture; gloeocystidia with spherical apical appendices; basidia developing laterally on hyphae (pleurobasidia); spores broadly ellipsoid to roughly spherical, with warty ornamentation.[41]
  • Russula: agaricoid, gasteroid or pleurotoid; never exuding latex; caps often brightly coloured with stipe and gills much paler; caps not zonate*; spore print white, cream, ochre, or orange; no true lactiferous hyphae*; sphaerocytes abundant in gill, cap, and stipe trama.[14][29]

Some characters of the mushroom-forming genera (marked with *) can be less obvious or absent in tropical species.[14][35] The distinction between Lactarius and Lactifluus based on morphology alone is quite difficult, as clear synapomorphies for both genera have yet to be identified.[16] Most field guides treat the two genera together, often because Lactifluus is not yet recognised as separate genus.[32][45]

Distribution[edit]

The Russulaceae as a whole have a worldwide distribution, but patterns differ among genera. Russula is the most widespread, found in North,[46][47] Central[48][49] and South America,[31][50] Europe,[32] temperate[51][52] and tropical Asia,[53][54] Africa,[55] and Australasia.[35][56][57] It is the only among the mushroom genera in Russulaceae that occurs in the Nothofagus zone of temperate South America.[58]

Lactarius is mainly known from the north temperate zone, but some species also occur in tropical Asia and Africa.[16] Lactifluus has a more tropical distribution than Lactarius, with most species known from tropical Africa, Asia, South America, and Australasia, but some also occurring in the north temperate zone.[16] Multifurca is the rarest among the four mushroom genera, known only from some punctual records in North and Central America, Asia, and Australasia.[14][18]

Species of Lactarius, Lactifluus, and Russula have repeatedly been introduced with trees outside their native range: An overview article lists introductions in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, the USA, Great Britain, the Faroe Islands, South Africa, China, Thailand, and New Zealand.[59]

Among the corticioid genera, Pseudoxenasma is only known from Europe.[60] In contrast, Boidinia species have been found in Europe,[61] Taiwan,[62] and Japan,[40] and Gloeopeniophorella species in North America,[63] South America,[42][64] Europe,[65] West Africa,[64] Taiwan,[62] Australia,[42] and New Zealand.[42]

Ecology[edit]

Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis[edit]

Landscape in an arctic setting with small trees and shrubs and ponds, at sunset
Arctic tundra, Canada
Dry, open woodland with mid-sized trees and high grass
Miombo woodland, Malawi
Ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae are found in a wide variety of habitats ranging from high latitudes to the Tropics.

The genera Lactarius, Lactifluus, Multifurca and Russula form a mutualistic ectomycorrhizal root symbiosis with trees and shrubs, exchanging mineral nutrients for photosynthetic sugar. They are one of several fungal lineages that have evolved such a lifestyle and are sometimes referred to as "/russula-lactarius" clade in the scientific literature.[66] Worldwide, they are one of the most frequently encountered lineages on ectomycorrhizal roots.[67] While some tropical species were initially believed to be parasitic, the observation that species fruiting on tree trunks do form ectomycorrhiza in tropical Guyana supports the view of an exclusively symbiotic lineage.[34]

Associations are known with several plant families. In the Northern Hemisphere, these are essentially the well-known ectomycorrhizal trees and shrubs in the Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Pinaceae and Salicaceae,[32][45] but in arctic and alpine habitats, Russulaceae also associate with Bistorta vivipara (Polygonaceae),[68] Kobresia (Cyperaceae),[69] and Dryas octopetala (Rosaceae),[70] ectomycorrhizal plants untypic in their respective families. In the Tropics, known plant partners include Dipterocarpaceae,[54][71] Fabaceae,[34][71] Nyctaginaceae,[72][73] Phyllanthaceae,[71] Polygonaceae (Coccoloba),[73] Sarcolaenaceae,[74] and the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon,[75] and in the Southern Hemisphere, Nothofagaceae,[57][58][76] Myrtaceae (Eucalyptus[56] and Leptospermum[57][76]), and Rhamnaceae (Pomaderris).[77] Some Russulaceae are quite specialised in their ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, such as Lactarius and Russula species that only grow with Cistus shrubs in the Mediterranean basin.[78]

The different plant partners are reflected in the wide variety of habitats worldwide.[79] Ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae have been observed in arctic and alpine tundra,[68] boreal and alpine forest,[51][80] north temperate forest,[32][45] mires,[81] mediterranean forests and scrub (maquis),[78][82] miombo woodland,[55] tropical lowland rainforest,[54][73] tropical cloud forest,[83] tropical dry forest,[84] Australian eucalypt woodlands,[85] and south temperate forests.[58][76][77] Where they are introduced, they typically grow in plantations of their native host species, e.g. with pine in South Africa,[86] Eucalyptus in Thailand,[87] or birch in New Zealand.[76]

Other types of mycorrhiza[edit]

Club-shaped, crowded root-tips of a plant with its violet stem emerging in the middle
Root tips of the myco-heterotrophic plant Monotropa uniflora, with a mycorrhizal sheath formed by Russula brevipes

Some of the ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae are also involved in other types of root symbioses with plants.

A mutualistic association similar to ectomycorrhiza but with some hyphae penetrating into the plant root cells, termed arbutoid mycorrhiza,[88] is formed by Russulaceae with shrubs of the genera Arbutus[82] and Arctostaphylos,[89] both in subfamily Arbutoideae of the Ericaceae.

Some Russulaceae are associated with myco-heterotrophic plants of the Ericaceae subfamily Monotropoideae, forming monotropoid mycorrhiza.[90][91] This is an epiparasitic relationship, where the heterotrophic plant ultimately derives its carbon from the primary, ectomycorrhizal plant partner of the fungus.[91] The association is often very specific, with the heterotrophic plants only associating with selected fungus partners, including Russulaceae.[90][92]

Russulaceae are also an important group of orchid mycorrhizal fungi.[93] This symbiosis is mutualistic in the case of green orchids,[88] but a partly or fully epiparasitic relationship in the case of myco-heterotrophic[94][95] and mixotrophic[96] orchids, respectively. In some cases, the association with Russulaceae is, as in monotropoid mycorrhiza, very specific: the Mediterranean orchid Limodorum abortivum only associates with Russula delica and closely related species;[96] in Corallorhiza maculata, different genotypes of the same species have distinct Russula partners.[94]

Wood decay species[edit]

The corticioid species in Boidinia, Gloeopeniophorella, and Pseudoxenasma are saprotrophic, wood-degrading fungi that develop on dead wood.[9] Their basal position suggests this has been the ancestral trophic mode of the Russulaceae, and that the mycorrhizal lifestyle (see above) evolved later.[9] The saprotrophic nature of these species has been questioned, based on the observation that other unconspicuous, crust-forming fungi are ectomycorrhizal;[13] subsequent authors reaffirm nevertheless that "[n]one of the corticioid species in the family shows any sign of mycorrhizal activity."[12]

Hypogeous fruiting[edit]

Hypogeous fruitbodies, i.e. fruitbodies developing below ground, occur in Lactarius and Russula and have previously been considered as distinct genera (see Systematics and taxonomy: Internal systematics). As such species are especially diverse in some warm and dry regions, e.g. in Spain,[3] California,[97] or Australia,[56] below-ground fruiting has been interpreted as an adaptation to drought.[38] However, hypogeous Russulaceae are also known from cold temperate regions[22][98] and tropical rainforest.[24] The fact that hypogeous species in the Russulaceae do not form their own lineages but are scattered in Russula or Lactarius shows that this type of fruiting evolved several times.[24] It is believed that these changes are evolutionarily quite recent.[24]

Parasites[edit]

A population of small, cream-coloured, gilled mushrooms growing on a black, old and partly degraded bigger mushroom
Asterophora parasitica grows on rotting Russulaceae fruitbodies.

Russulaceae fruitbodies are subject to parasitisation by other fungi. The genus Asterophora develops on old fruitbodies of the mushroom species in the family,[45] as does Dendrocollybia racemosa on at least Russula crassotunicata.[99] Fruitbodies of Lactifluus or Russula species otherwise hot-tasting and unpalatable are regarded as choice edibles in North America when infected by the "lobster mushroom" Hypomyces lactifluorum.[45] Heterotrophic plants, including orchids or monotropoids, also parasitise ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae and their plant partners – see above, Other types of mycorrhiza.

Threats and conservation[edit]

As for most fungi,[100] few information is available on the level of threat in Russulaceae species, such that they have not been assessed in the international IUCN Red List.[101] However, national lists contain some species of Lactarius, Lactifluus and Russula, indicating that they have small populations and are endangered, e.g. in Great Britain,[102] Switzerland,[103] the Czech Republic,[104] and New Zealand.[105]

Although data on Russulaceae themselves are scarce, more is known about the habitats they occur in, especially for the ectomycorrhizal species which depend on their host plants: Several of these habitats are affected by loss or degradation, such as peatlands,[106] Mediterranean forests and scrub[107] or tropical African dry woodland.[108] Similarly, dead wood, the habitat of the corticioid Russulaceae, is rare in many exploited forests and needs special management.[109]

Recent studies have found some traditional Russulaceae species to comprise several cryptic species (see Systematics and taxonomy: Species diversity). This may imply that distribution range and population size for each of such distinct species are smaller than previously thought.[110]

Edibility[edit]

Fruitbodies of two mushroom species, one blue and one orange, are presented on large plant leaves
Lactarius indigo and another Lactarius species for sale on a market in Guatemala

Several species of Lactarius, Lactifluus and Russula are valued as excellent edible mushrooms. This is the case for example for the north temperate species Lactarius deliciosus, Lactifluus volemus, or Russula vesca, and other species are popular in other parts of the world, e.g. Lactarius indigo in Mexico, or Lactifluus edulis in tropical Africa.[111] Some species, like Russula vesca, can even be eaten raw.[112] The brittle texture of Russula fruitbodies makes them different from other mushrooms and is not appreciated by some.[113]

Several species have a hot to very acrid taste and can cause gastrointestinal symptoms.[114] Despite this, such species are eaten in some regions, e.g. Lactarius torminosus in Finland[115] or Russia.[116] Often, they are parboiled or pickled to make them palatable,[117] and sometimes, they are used as spice, for example Russula emetica in Eastern Europe.[118] Some species are however truly poisonous: The East Asian and North American Russula subnigricans causes rhabdomyolysis and is potentially lethal;[119] Lactarius turpis from Eurasia contains a mutagenic substance.[120]

Cultivation of edible Russulaceae, as in other ectomycorrhizal fungi, is challenging, since the presence of host trees is required. In spite of this difficulty, the European Lactarius deliciosus has been successfully grown in "mushroom orchards" in New Zealand.[121]

Chemistry[edit]

The finger of a hand are holding a light blue mushroom. On the tip of the thumb is a bright-blue colored substance somewhat resembling paint. Two fingertip-sized areas on the under surface of the mushroom have a dark blue discoloration.
Lactarius indigo contains a striking blue pigment.

Fruitbodies of Russulaceae have been the subject of natural product research, and different classes of organic compounds have been isolated from them.

Aroma compounds are responsible for the particular odour or taste in some species, e.g. sotolon in the fenugreek-smelling Lactarius helvus,[122] or the similar quabalactone III in Lactarius rubidus which causes a maple syrup-like odour in dried specimens.[123] Pigments have been isolated from brightly coloured species, e.g. (7-isopropenyl-4-methylazulen-1-yl)methyl stearate from the blue Lactarius indigo[124] or russulaflavidin and a derivative from the yellow Russula flavida.[125] Some Russula species contain pigmented pteridine derivatives called russupteridines that are not found in the milk-caps.[126] Sesquiterpenes are characteristic secondary metabolites of many Russulaceae, especially milk-caps which have been quite intensively studied.[127][128] They are thought to be responsible for the hot taste in many species and may have deterrent, antifeeding functions in nature.[127]

Other metabolites isolated from different species include dibenzonaphtyridinone alkaloids,[127] prenylated phenols,[127] benzofurans,[127] chromenes,[127] natural rubber (polyisoprene),[129] sterols,[130] and the sugar alcohol volemitol.[131] Among toxic substances, Lactarius turpis contains the mutagenic alkaloid necatorin,[120] and the rather small compound cycloprop-2-ene carboxylic acid has been identified as the toxic agent in Russula subnigricans.[132] Some secondary metabolites showed antibiotic properties in laboratory tests.[127] An ethanolic extract of Russula delica was antibacterial,[133] and a lectin from Russula rosea showed antitumor activity.[134]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Lotsy, JP. (1907). Vorträge über botanische Stammesgeschichte [Lectures on botanical phylogeny, held at the Imperial University of Leiden] (in German). Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer. p. 708.  open access publication - free to read
  2. ^ a b c Pegler DN, Young TWK. (1979). "The gasteroid Russulales". Transactions of the British Mycological Society 72 (3): 353–388. doi:10.1016/S0007-1536(79)80143-6. 
  3. ^ a b c d e Calonge FD, Martín MP. (2000). "Morphological and molecular data on the taxonomy of Gymnomyces, Martellia and Zelleromyces (Elasmomycetaceae, Russulales)" (PDF). Mycotaxon 76: 9–15.  open access publication - free to read
  4. ^ a b "Russulaceae Lotsy, Truffe, ed. 2: 708 (1907)". MycoBank. International Mycological Association. Retrieved 2014-12-28. 
  5. ^ Roze ME. (1876). "Catalogue des agaricinées observées aux environs de Paris" [Catalogue of agarics observed around Paris]. Bulletin de la Société botanique de France (in French) 23 (3): 108–115 (see p. 110). doi:10.1080/00378941.1876.10825634. 
  6. ^ Singer R. (1986). The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy (4th ed.). Königstein im Taunus, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books. ISBN 978-3-87429-254-2. 
  7. ^ Donk MA. (1971). "Progress in the study of the classification of the higher Basidiomycetes". In Petersen RH. Evolution in the Higher Basidiomycetes. Knoxville. pp. 3–25. 
  8. ^ Oberwinkler F. (1977). "Das neue System der Basidiomyceten [The new basidiomycete system]". In Frey W, Hurka H, Oberwinkler F. Beiträge zur Biologie der niederen Pflanzen (in German). Stuttgart; New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. pp. 59–104. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Larsson E, Larsson K-H. (2003). "Phylogenetic relationships of russuloid basidiomycetes with emphasis on aphyllophoralean taxa". Mycologia 95 (6): 1037–1065. doi:10.2307/3761912. PMID 21149013.  open access publication - free to read
  10. ^ Hibbett DH, Thorn RG. (2001). "Basidiomycota: Homobasidiomycetes". In McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA. The Mycota. VIIB. Systematics and Evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 121–168. ISBN 978-3-540-58008-9. 
  11. ^ Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE et al. (2007). "A higher level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi" (PDF). Mycological Research 111 (5): 509–547. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004. PMID 17572334. 
  12. ^ a b c d e Larsson K-H. (2007). "Re-thinking the classification of corticioid fungi". Mycological Research 111 (9): 1040–1063. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.001. 
  13. ^ a b c d Miller SL, Larsson E, Larsson K-H, Verbeken A, Nuytinck J. (2006). "Perspectives in the new Russulales" (PDF). Mycologia 98 (6): 960–970. doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.960. 
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Buyck B, Hofstetter V, Eberhardt U, Verbeken A, Kauff F. (2008). "Walking the thin line between Russula and Lactarius: The dilemma of Russula sect. Ochricompactae" (PDF). Fungal Diversity 28: 15–40. 
  15. ^ a b Buyck B, Hofstetter V, Verbeken A, Walleyn R. (2010). "Proposal to conserve Lactarius nom. cons. (Basidiomycota) with conserved type". Taxon 59: 447–453.  open access publication - free to read
  16. ^ a b c d e f Verbeken A, Nuytinck J. (2013). "Not every milkcap is a Lactarius" (PDF). Scripta Botanica Belgica 51: 162–168. 
  17. ^ a b c d e Kirk PM. "Species Fungorum (version October 2014). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life". Species 2000 & ITIS. Retrieved 2014-10-30. 
  18. ^ a b Lebel T, Dunk CW, May TW. (2013). "Rediscovery of Multifurca stenophylla (Berk.) T.Lebel, C.W.Dunk & T.W.May comb. nov. (Russulaceae) from Australia". Mycological Progress 12 (3): 497–504. doi:10.1007/s11557-012-0856-4. 
  19. ^ Arora D, Nguyen N. (2014). "A new species of Russula, subgenus Compactae from California" (PDF). North American Fungi 8 (8): 1–7. ISSN 1937-786X.  open access publication - free to read
  20. ^ Miller S, Aime MC, Henkel TW. (2013). "Russulaceae of the Pakaraima Mountains of Guyana 2. New species of Russula and Lactifluus" (PDF). Mycotaxon 121 (1): 233–253. doi:10.5248/121.233. 
  21. ^ Sá MCA, Wartchow F. (2013). "Lactifluus aurantiorugosus (Russulaceae), a new species from Southern Brazil" (PDF). Darwiniana, nueva serie 1: 54–60. 
  22. ^ a b Trierveiler-Pereira L, Smith ME, Trappe JM, Nouhra E. (2014). "Sequestrate fungi from Patagonian Nothofagus forests: Cystangium (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota)". Mycologia 107 (1): 90–103. doi:10.3852/13-302. PMID 25232070. 
  23. ^ Maba DL, Guelly AK, Yorou NS, De Kesel A, Verbeken A, Agerer R. (2013). "The genus Lactarius s. str. (Basidiomycota, Russulales) in Togo (West Africa): phylogeny and a new species described". IMA Fungus 5 (1): 39–49. doi:10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.01.05. PMC 4107895. PMID 25083405.  open access publication - free to read
  24. ^ a b c d e f g Verbeken A, Stubbe D, van de Putte K, Eberhardt U, Nuytinck J. (2014). "Tales of the unexpected: angiocarpous representatives of the Russulaceae in tropical South East Asia". Persoonia 32 (1): 13–24. doi:10.3767/003158514X679119.  open access publication - free to read
  25. ^ Vellinga EC. (2013). "The North American Mycoflora Project: Without a sequenced specimen it is a rumor". McIlvainea (22): V22/north_american_mycoflora.html.  open access publication - free to read
  26. ^ Van de Putte K, Nuytinck J, Stubbe D, Le HT, Verbeken A. (2010). "Lactarius volemus sensu lato (Russulales) from northern Thailand: Morphological and phylogenetic species concepts explored". Fungal Diversity 45 (1): 99–130. doi:10.1007/s13225-010-0070-0. 
  27. ^ De Crop E, Nuytinck J, Van de Putte K, Lecomte M, Eberhardt U, Verbeken A. (2014). "Lactifluus piperatus (Russulales, Basidiomycota) and allied species in Western Europe and a preliminary overview of the group worldwide". Mycological Progress 13 (3): 493–511. doi:10.1007/s11557-013-0931-5. 
  28. ^ "Contrasting evolutionary patterns in two sister genera of macrofungi: Lactarius and Lactifluus". Ghent University. Retrieved 2014-10-10. 
  29. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Russulales News / Characteristics of the russuloid fungi". Museo delle scienze. Retrieved 2014-11-01. 
  30. ^ Heim R. (1938). "Diagnoses latines d'espèces et variétés nouvelles de Lactario-russulés du domaine oriental de Madagascar [Latin diagnoses for new species and varieties of Lactario-Russulas from the Eastern domain of Madagascar]". Candollea (in French/Latin) 7: 374–393. 
  31. ^ a b Singer R, Aurajuo I, Ivory MH (1983). "The ectotrophically mycorrhizal fungi of the neotropical lowlands, especially central Amazonia". Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia: 1–352. 
  32. ^ a b c d e f g h i Courtecuisse R, Duhem B. (2013). Champignons de France et d'Europe [Mushrooms of France and Europe]. Guide Delachaux (in French). Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé. ISBN 978-2-603-02038-8. 
  33. ^ Buyck B, Verbeken A. (1995). "Studies in tropical African Lactarius species, 2: Lactarius chromospermus Pegler". Mycotaxon 56: 427–442. 
  34. ^ a b c d Henkel T, Aime MC, Miller SL. (2000). "Systematics of pleurotoid Russulaceae from Guyana and Japan, with notes on their ectomycorrhizal status" (PDF). Mycologia 92 (6): 1119–1132. doi:10.2307/3761479. JSTOR 3761479. 
  35. ^ a b c d Buyck B, Horak E. (1999). "New taxa of pleurotoid Russulaceae". Mycologia 91 (3): 532–537. doi:10.2307/3761355. JSTOR 3761355. 
  36. ^ Wang X-H, Stubbe D, Verbeken A. (2012). "Lactifluus parvigerardii sp. nov., a new link towards the pleurotoid habit in Lactifluus subgen. Gerardii (Russulaceae, Russulales)". Cryptogamie, Mycologie 332 (2): 181–190. doi:10.7872/crym.v33.iss2.2012.181. 
  37. ^ Morozova OV, Popov ES, Kovalenko AE. (2013). "Studies on mycobiota of Vietnam. II. Two new species of Lactifluus (Russulaceae) with pleurotoid basidiomata" (PDF). Mikologia i Fitopatologia 47 (2): 92–102. 
  38. ^ a b c d Thiers HD. (1984). "The secotioid syndrome" (PDF). Mycologia 76 (1): 1–8. doi:10.2307/3792830. JSTOR 3792830. 
  39. ^ a b Desjardin DE. (2003). "A unique ballistosporic hypogeous sequestrate Lactarius from California". Mycologia 95 (1): 148–155. doi:10.2307/3761974. JSTOR 3761974.  open access publication - free to read
  40. ^ a b c Maekawa N. (1994). "Taxonomic study of Japanese Corticiaceae (Aphyllophoraceae) II". Report of the Tottori Mycological Institue 32: 1–123. 
  41. ^ a b Hjortstam K, Larsson K-H. (1976). "Pseudoxenasma, a new genus of Corticiaceae (Basidiomycetes)". Mycotaxon 4 (1): 307–311. 
  42. ^ a b c d e Hjortstam K, Ryvarden L. (2007). "Studies in corticioid fungi from Venezuela III (Basidiomycotina, Aphyllophorales)". Synopsis Fungorum 23: 56–107. 
  43. ^ Cannon PF, Kirk PM. (2007). Fungal Families of the World. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. pp. 317–318. ISBN 978-0-85199-827-5. 
  44. ^ Ammirati JF, Traquair JA, Horgen PA. (1985). Poisonous Mushrooms of Canada: Including other Inedible Fungi. Markham, Ontario: Fitzhenry & Whiteside in cooperation with Agriculture Canada and the Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Supply and Services Canada. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-88902-977-4. 
  45. ^ a b c d e Bessette AE, Bessette AR, Fischer D. (1996). Mushrooms of Northeastern North America. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-0388-7. 
  46. ^ Earle FS. (1902). "A key to the North American species of Russula – I". Torreya 2 (7): 101–103. JSTOR 40594086.  open access publication - free to read
  47. ^ Earle FS. (1902). "A key to the North American species of Russula – II". Torreya 2 (8): 117–119. JSTOR 40594096.  open access publication - free to read
  48. ^ Gómez-Pignataro LD, Alfaro RM. (1996). "Basidiomicetes de Costa Rica. De Russulae novae". Revista de Biología Tropical (in Spanish with English abstract) 44 (Suppl. 4): 25–37.  open access publication - free to read
  49. ^ Buyck B, Ovrebo CL. (2002). "New and interesting Russula species from Panamá". Mycologia 94 (5): 888–901. doi:10.2307/3761704.  open access publication - free to read
  50. ^ Sá MCA, Baseia IG, Wartchow F. (2013). "Checklist of Russulaceae from Brazil" (PDF). Mycotaxon. online 125: 303.  open access publication - free to read
  51. ^ a b Guo J, Karunarathna SC, Mortimer PE, Xu J, Hyde KD. (2014). "Phylogenetic diversity of Russula from Xiaozhongdian, Yunnan, China, inferred from Internal Transcribed Spacer sequence data" (PDF). Chiang Mai Journal of Science 41 (4): 811–821. 
  52. ^ Gorbunova IA. (2014). "Biota of agaricoid and gasteriod basidiomycetes of dryad tundras of the Altai-Sayan mountain area (Southern Siberia)". Contemporary problems of Ecology 7 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1134/S1995425514010065. 
  53. ^ Lee LS, Alexander IJ, Watling R. (1997). "Ectomycorrhizas and putative ectomycorrhizal fungi of Shorea leprosula Miq. (Dipterocarpaceae)". Mycorrhiza 7 (2): 63–81. doi:10.1007/s005720050165. 
  54. ^ a b c Natarajan KN, Senthilarasu G, Kumaresan V, Rivière T. (2005). "Diversity in ectomycorrhizal fungi of a dipterocarp forest in Western Ghats" (PDF). Current Science 88 (12): 1893–1895.  open access publication - free to read
  55. ^ a b Verbeken A, Buyck B. (2002). "Diversity and ecology of tropical ectomycorrhizal fungi in Africa". In Watling R, Frankland JC, Ainsworth AM, Isaac S, Robinson CH. Tropical Mycology: Macromycetes (PDF). Wallingford, UK: CAB International. pp. 11–21.  open access publication - free to read
  56. ^ a b c Bougher NL. (1996). "Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with eucalypts in Australia". In Brundett M, Dell B, Malajczuk N, Mingqin G. Mycorrhizas for plantation forestry in Asia (PDF). ACIAR Proceedings. pp. 8–15. ISBN 978-1-86320-167-4.  open access publication - free to read
  57. ^ a b c McNabb RFR. (1973). "Russulaceae of New Zealand 2. Russula Pers. ex S. F. Gray". New Zealand Journal of Botany 11 (4): 673–730. doi:10.1080/0028825X.1973.10430308.  open access publication - free to read
  58. ^ a b c Singer R. (1953). "Four years of mycological work in southern South America". Mycologia 45 (6): 865–891. JSTOR 4547770. 
  59. ^ Vellinga EC, Wolfe BE, Pringle A. (2009). "Global patterns of ectomycorrhizal introductions". New Phytologist 181 (4): 960–973. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02728.x. PMID 19170899.  open access publication - free to read
  60. ^ "Pseudoxenasma verrucisporum". Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Retrieved 2014-11-20. 
  61. ^ Bernicchia A, Gorjón SP. (2010). Corticiaceae s.l. Fungi Europaei 12. Alassio, Italy: Edizioni Candusso. ISBN 9788890105791. 
  62. ^ a b Wu SH. (1996). "Studies on Gloeocystidiellum sensu lato (Basidiomycotina) in Taiwan". Mycotaxon 58: 1–68. 
  63. ^ Ginns J, Freeman GW. (1994). "The Gloeocystidiellaceae (Basidiomycota, Hericiales) of North America". Bibliotheca Mycologica 157: 1–118. 
  64. ^ a b Boidin J, Lanquetin P, Gilles G. (1997). "Le genre Gloeocystidiellum sensu lato (Basidiomycotina)". Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France (in French) 113 (1): 1–80. 
  65. ^ Eriksson J, Ryvarden L. (1975). The Corticiaceae of North Europe 3. Oslo: Fungiflora. 
  66. ^ "UNITE database: EcM genera and lineages". University of Tartu. Retrieved 2014-10-25. 
  67. ^ Tedersoo L, Nara K. (2010). "General latitudinal gradient of biodiversity is reversed in ectomycorrhizal fungi". New Phytologist 185 (2): 351–354. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03134.x.  open access publication - free to read
  68. ^ a b Gardes M, Dahlberg A. (1996). "Mycorrhizal diversity in arctic and alpine tundra: An open question". New Phytologist 133 (1): 147–157. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04350.x.  open access publication - free to read
  69. ^ Gao Q, Yang ZL. (2010). "Ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with two species of Kobresia in an alpine meadow in the eastern Himalaya". Mycorrhiza 20 (4): 281–287. doi:10.1007/s00572-009-0287-5. PMC 2845889. PMID 20012655.  open access publication - free to read
  70. ^ Harrington TJ, Mitchell DT. (2002). "Characterization of Dryas octopetala ectomycorrhizas from limestone karst vegetation, western Ireland". Canadian Journal of Botany 80 (9): 970–982. doi:10.1139/b02-082. 
  71. ^ a b c Bâ A, Duponnois R, Diabaté, Dreyfus B. (2011). Les champignons ectomycorhiziens des arbres forestiers en Afrique de l’Ouest [The ectomycorrhizal fungi of planted trees in West Africa] (in French). Marseille: Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD). pp. 88–140. ISBN 978-2-7099-1684-4. 
  72. ^ Haug I, Weiß M, Homeier J, Oberwinkler F, Kottke I. (2005). "Russulaceae and Thelephoraceae form ectomycorrhizas with members of the Nyctaginaceae (Caryophyllales) in the tropical mountain rain forest of southern Ecuador". New Phytologist 165 (3): 923–936. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01284.x.  open access publication - free to read
  73. ^ a b c Tedersoo L, Sadam A, Zambrano M, Valencia R, Bahram M. (2009). "Low diversity and high host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Western Amazonia, a neotropical biodiversity hotspot". The ISME Journal 4 (4): 465–471. doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.131.  open access publication - free to read
  74. ^ Ducousso M, Ramanankierana H, Duponnois R, Rabévohitra R, Randrihasipara L, Vincelette M, Dreyfus B, Prin Y. (2008). "Mycorrhizal status of native trees and shrubs from eastern Madagascar littoral forests with special emphasis on one new ectomycorrhizal endemic family, the Asteropeiaceae". New Phytologist 178 (2): 233–238. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02389.x.  open access publication - free to read
  75. ^ Tedersoo L, Põlme S. (2012). "Infrageneric variation in partner specificity: Multiple ectomycorrhizal symbionts associate with Gnetum gnemon (Gnetophyta) in Papua New Guinea". Mycorrhiza 22 (8): 663–668. doi:10.1007/s00572-012-0458-7. 
  76. ^ a b c d McNabb RFR. (1971). "The Russulaceae of New Zealand 1. Lactarius DC ex S. F. Gray". New Zealand Journal of Botany 9 (1): 46–66. doi:10.1080/0028825X.1971.10430170.  open access publication - free to read
  77. ^ a b Tedersoo L, Jairus T, Horton BM, Abarenkov K, Suvi T, Saar I, Kõljalg U. (2008). "Strong host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest as revealed by DNA barcoding and taxon-specific primers". New Phytologist 180 (2): 479–490. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02561.x.  open access publication - free to read
  78. ^ a b Comandini O, Contu M, Rinaldi AC. (2006). "An overview of Cistus ectomycorrhizal fungi" (PDF). Mycorrhiza 16 (6): 381–395. doi:10.1007/s00572-006-0047-8. PMID 16896800. 
  79. ^ "Russulales News / Where do we find Russulales?". Museo delle scienze. Retrieved 2014-11-01. 
  80. ^ Toljander JF, Eberhardt U, Toljander YK, Paul LS, Taylor AFS. (2006). "Species composition of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community along a local nutrient gradient in a boreal forest". New Phytologist 170 (4): 873–884. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01718.x.  open access publication - free to read
  81. ^ Thormann MN, Rice AV. (2007). "Fungi from peatlands" (PDF). Fungal Diversity 24: 241–299. 
  82. ^ a b Richard F, Millot S, Gardes M, Selosse M-A. (2005). "Diversity and specificity of ectomycorrhizal fungi retrieved from an old-growth Mediterranean forest dominated by Quercus ilex". New Phytologist 166 (3): 1011–1023. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01382.x.  open access publication - free to read
  83. ^ Halling RE, Mueller GM. "Agarics and boletes of neotropical oakwoods". In Watling R, Frankland JC, Ainsworth AM, Isaac S, Robinson CH. Tropical Mycology: Macromycetes (PDF). Wallingford, UK: CAB International. pp. 1–10.  open access publication - free to read
  84. ^ Phosri C, Põlme S, Taylor AFS, Kõljalg U, Suwannasai N, Tedersoo L. (2012). "Diversity and community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a dry deciduous dipterocarp forest in Thailand". Biodiversity and Conservation 21 (9): 2287–2298. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0250-1. 
  85. ^ Miller OK Jr, Hilton RN. (1986). "New and interesting agarics from Western Australia" (PDF). Sydowia 39: 126–137. 
  86. ^ van der Westhuizen GCA, Eicker A. (1987). "Some fungal symbionts of ectotrophic mycorrhizae of pines in South Africa". South African Forestry Journal 143 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1080/00382167.1987.9630296. 
  87. ^ Chalermpongse A. (1995). The occurrence and use of ectomycorrhizal fungi in eucalypt plantations in Thailand. In ACIAR PROCEEDINGS (PDF). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. pp. 127–131.  open access publication - free to read
  88. ^ a b Smith SE, Read D. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis (3rd ed.). Amsterdam; Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-370526-6. 
  89. ^ Mühlmann O, Göbl F. (2006). "Mycorrhiza of the host-specific Lactarius deterrimus on the roots of Picea abies and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi". Mycorrhiza 16 (4): 245–250. doi:10.1007/s00572-006-0038-9. PMID 16496189. 
  90. ^ a b Cullings KW, Szaro TM, Bruns TD. (1996). "Evolution of extreme specialization within a lineage of ectomycorrhizal epiparasites" (PDF). Nature 379 (6560): 63–66. doi:10.1038/379063a0. 
  91. ^ a b Bidartondo MI. (2005). "The evolutionary ecology of myco-heterotrophy". New Phytologist 167 (2): 335–352. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01429.x.  open access publication - free to read
  92. ^ Yang S, Pfister DH. (2006). "Monotropa uniflora plants of eastern Massachusetts form mycorrhizae with a diversity of russulacean fungi". Mycologia 98 (4): 535–540. doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.4.535. PMID 17139846.  open access publication - free to read
  93. ^ Dearnaley JDW. (2007). "Further advances in orchid mycorrhizal research". Mycorrhiza 17 (6): 475–486. doi:10.1007/s00572-007-0138-1. 
  94. ^ a b Taylor DL, Bruns TD, Hodges SA. (2004). "Evidence for mycorrhizal races in a cheating orchid". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271 (1534): 35–43. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2557.  open access publication - free to read
  95. ^ Roy M, Watthana S, Stier A, Richard F, Vessabutr S, Selosse M-A. (2009). "Two mycoheterotrophic orchids from Thailand tropical dipterocarpacean forests associate with a broad diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi". BMC Biology 7 (1): 51. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-51.  open access publication - free to read
  96. ^ a b Girlanda M, Selosse M-A, Cafasso D, Brilli F, Delfine S, Fabbian R, Ghignone S, Pinelli R, Segreto R, Loreto F, Cozzolino S, Perotto S. (2005). "Inefficient photosynthesis in the Mediterranean orchid Limodorum abortivum is mirrored by specific association to ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae" (PDF). Molecular Ecology 15 (2): 491–504. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02770.x. 
  97. ^ Smith ME, Trappe JM, Rizzo DM, Miller SM. (2006). "Gymnomyces xerophilus sp. nov. (sequestrate Russulaceae), an ectomycorrhizal associate of Quercus in California". Mycological Research 110 (5): 575–582. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2006.03.001. 
  98. ^ Nuytinck J, Verbeken A, Delarue S, Walleyn R. (2003). "Systematics of European sequestrate lactarioid Russulaceae with spiny spore ornamentation". Belgian Journal of Botany 136 (2): 145–153. JSTOR 20794526. 
  99. ^ Machniki N, Wright LL, Allen A, Robertson CP, Meyer C, Birkebak JM, Ammirati JF. (2006). "Russula crassotunicata identified as a host for Dendrocollybia racemosa" (PDF). Pacific Northwest Fungi 1 (9): 1–7. doi:10.2509/pnwf.2006.001.009.  open access publication - free to read
  100. ^ "The Global Fungal Red List Initiative". International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Retrieved 2014-11-16. 
  101. ^ "The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3". International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Retrieved 2014-11-15. 
  102. ^ Evans S, Henrici A, Ing B. (2006). "Red Data List of Threatened British Fungi" (PDF). British Mycological Society. 
  103. ^ Senn-Irlet B, Bieri G, Egli S. (2007). Rote Liste der gefährdeten Grosspilze der Schweiz [Red list of endangered macromycetes of Switzerland] (in German). Bern; Birmensdorf: Bundesamt für Umwelt & WSL.  open access publication - free to read
  104. ^ Holec J, Beran M. (2006). "Red list of fungi (macromycetes) of the Czech Republic" (PDF). Příroda (in Czech with English summary) 24: 1–282. ISSN 1211-3603. 
  105. ^ "Nationally Critical: Rare and endangered fungi". Landcare Research. Retrieved 2014-11-15. 
  106. ^ Parkyn L, Stoneman RE, Ingram HAP., ed. (1997). Conserving peatlands. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. ISBN 978-0-85198-998-3. 
  107. ^ Médail F, Quézel P. (1999). "Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting global conservation priorities". Conservation Biology 13 (6): 1510–1513. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98467.x. 
  108. ^ Sjumpangani S, Chirwa PW, Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G, Ajayi O. (2009). "The miombo woodlands at the cross roads: Potential threats, sustainable livelihoods, policy gaps and challenges". Natural Resources Forum 33 (2): 150–159. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01218.x. 
  109. ^ Jonsson BG, Kruys N, Ranius T. (2005). "Ecology of species living on dead wood – Lessons for dead wood management" (PDF). Silva Fennica 39 (2): 289–309. doi:10.14214/sf.390.  open access publication - free to read
  110. ^ Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I. (2007). "Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22 (3): 148–155. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004. 
  111. ^ "Russulales News / Edibility and toxicity of Russulales". Museo delle scienze. Retrieved 2014-12-13. 
  112. ^ Zeitlmayr L. (1976). Wild Mushrooms: An Illustrated Handbook. London, UK: Transatlantic Arts. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-584-10324-3. 
  113. ^ Arora D. (1986). Mushrooms Demystified: A Comprehensive Guide to the Fleshy Fungi. Berkeley, California: Ten Speed Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-89815-169-5. 
  114. ^ Miller HR, Miller OK Jr. (2006). North American Mushrooms: A Field Guide to Edible and Inedible Fungi. Guilford, Connecticut: Falcon Guides. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-7627-3109-1. 
  115. ^ Veteläinen M, Huldén M, Pehu T. (2008). State of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Finland. Second Finnish National Report (PDF). Country Report on the State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (Report) (Sastamala, Finland: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry): 14. 
  116. ^ Molokhovets E. (1992). Classic Russian Cooking. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-253-21210-8. 
  117. ^ Roberts P, Evans S. (2014). The Book of Fungi: A Life-Size Guide to Six Hundred Species from around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 595. ISBN 978-0-226-17719-9. 
  118. ^ Rogers R. (2006). The Fungal Pharmacy: Medicinal Mushrooms of Western Canada. Edmonton, Alberta: Prairie Deva Press. p. 178. ISBN 978-0-9781358-1-2. 
  119. ^ Chen Z, Zhang P, Zhang Z. (2014). "Investigation and analysis of 102 mushroom poisoning cases in Southern China from 1994 to 2012". Fungal Diversity 64 (1): 123–131. doi:10.1007/s13225-013-0260-7. 
  120. ^ a b Suortti T, von Wright A, Koskinen A. (1983). "Necatorin, a highly mutagenic compound from Lactarius necator". Phytochemistry 22 (12): 2873–2874. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97723-9. 
  121. ^ Guerin-Laguette A, Cummings N, Butler RC, Willows A, Hesom-Williams N, Li S, Wang Y. (2014). "Lactarius deliciosus and Pinus radiata in New Zealand: Towards the development of innovative gourmet mushroom orchards". Mycorrhiza 24 (7): 511–523. doi:10.1007/s00572-014-0570-y. 
  122. ^ Rapior S, Fons F, Bessière J-M. (2000). "The fenugreek odor of Lactarius helvus". Mycologia 92: 305–308. JSTOR 3761565. 
  123. ^ Wood WF, Brandes JA, Foy BD, Morgan CG, Mann TD, DeShazer DA. (2012). "The maple syrup odour of the "candy cap" mushroom, Lactarius fragilis var. rubidus". Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 43: 51–53. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2012.02.027. 
  124. ^ Harmon AD, Weisgraber KH, Weiss U. (1979). "Preformed azulene pigments of Lactarius indigo (Schw.) Fries (Russulaceae, Basidiomycetes)". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 36 (1): 54–56. doi:10.1007/BF02003967. 
  125. ^ Fröde R, Bröckelmann M, Steffan B, Steglich W, Marumoto R. (1995). "A novel type of triterpenoid quinone methide pigment from the toadstool Russula flavida (Agaricales)". Tetrahedron 51 (9): 2553–2560. doi:10.1016/0040-4020(95)00012-W. 
  126. ^ Gry J, Andersson C. (2014). Mushrooms Traded as Food. Vol II sec. 2. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. p. 236. ISBN 978-92-893-2705-3. 
  127. ^ a b c d e f g Vitari G, Vita-Finzi P. (1995). Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. Structure and Chemistry (Part D) 17. Elsevier Science. p. 153. ISBN 978-0-08-054198-3. 
  128. ^ Kobata K, Kano S, Shibata H. (1995). "New lactarane sesquiterpenoid from the fungus Russula emetica". Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 59 (2): 316–318. doi:10.1271/bbb.59.316. 
  129. ^ Tanaka Y, Kawahara S, Eng A-H, Takei A, Ohya N. (1994). "Structure of cis-polyisoprene from Lactarius mushrooms". Acta Biochimica Polonica 41 (3): 303–309. ISSN 0001-527X. PMID 7856401. 
  130. ^ Yue J-M, Chen S-N, Lin Z-W, Sun H-D. (2001). "Sterols from the fungus Lactarius volemus". Phytochemistry 56 (8): 801–806. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00490-8. PMID 11324907. 
  131. ^ Bourquelot E. "Sur la volémite, nouvelle matière sucrée" [On volémite, a new sweet substance]. Journal de Pharmacie et de Chimie, Paris (in French) 2: 385–390. 
  132. ^ Matsuura M, Saikawa Y, Inui K, Nakae K, Igarashi M, Hashimoto K, Nakata M. (2009). "Identification of the toxic trigger in mushroom poisoning". Nature Chemical Biology 5 (7): 465–467. doi:10.1038/nchembio.179. PMID 19465932. 
  133. ^ Yaltirak T, Aslim B, Ozturk S, Alli H. (2009). "Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Russula delica Fr.". Food and Chemical Toxicology 47 (8): 2052–2056. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2009.05.029. 
  134. ^ Zhang G, Sun, J, Wang H, Ng TB. (2010). "First isolation and characterization of a novel lectin with potent antitumor activity from a Russula mushroom". Phytomedicine 17 (10): 775–781. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2010.02.001. 

External links[edit]