|This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2011)|
Normally, data transfer between programs is accomplished using data structures suited for automated processing by computers, not people. Such interchange formats and protocols are typically rigidly structured, well-documented, easily parsed, and keep ambiguity to a minimum. Very often, these transmissions are not human-readable at all.
Thus, the key element that distinguishes data scraping from regular parsing is that the output being scraped was intended for display to an end-user, rather than as input to another program, and is therefore usually neither documented nor structured for convenient parsing. Data scraping often involves ignoring binary data (usually images or multimedia data), display formatting, redundant labels, superfluous commentary, and other information which is either irrelevant or hinders automated processing.
Data scraping is most often done to either interface to a legacy system which has no other mechanism which is compatible with current hardware, or to interface to a third-party system which does not provide a more convenient API. In the second case, the operator of the third-party system will often see screen scraping as unwanted, due to reasons such as increased system load, the loss of advertisement revenue, or the loss of control of the information content.
Data scraping is generally considered an ad hoc, inelegant technique, often used only as a "last resort" when no other mechanism for data interchange is available. Aside from the higher programming and processing overhead, output displays intended for human consumption often change structure frequently. Humans can cope with this easily, but a computer program may report nonsense, have been told to read data in a particular format or from a particular place, and with no knowledge of how to check its results for validity.
Caveat: the former claim automatically excludes replacing any attempts to automate heterogenous large-scale systems by intelligent bots. Within the realm of the command line interface, deterministic commands and their deterministic parse: if results can be read, processed and acted upon as eyes of an intelligent agent, (much like an economic agent) off any CLI (command line interface), said parse is game to be automated within any given heterogenous digital sub-system. This remark is relative to the NFV/SDN movement within the realm of Telcos worldwide and general defencies in normalisation within the realm of IETF. Thus provisoning services in said manner, checking telco network state by means of heterogenous sshV2/cli network equipment interrogation is definitely not "screen-scraping" nor "data-scraping". Pray tell a more 'elegant' vendor-agnostic solution within the realm of vendor-agnostic network automation and telco NFV/SDN orchestration.
Screen scraping is normally associated with the programmatic collection of visual data from a source, instead of parsing data as in web scraping. Originally, screen scraping referred to the practice of reading text data from a computer display terminal's screen. This was generally done by reading the terminal's memory through its auxiliary port, or by connecting the terminal output port of one computer system to an input port on another. The term screen scraping is also commonly used to refer to the bidirectional exchange of data. This could be the simple cases where the controlling program navigates through the user interface, or more complex scenarios where the controlling program is entering data into an interface meant to be used by a human.
As a concrete example of a classic screen scraper, consider a hypothetical legacy system dating from the 1960s — the dawn of computerized data processing. Computer to user interfaces from that era were often simply text-based dumb terminals which were not much more than virtual teleprinters (such systems are still in use today[update], for various reasons). The desire to interface such a system to more modern systems is common. A robust solution will often require things no longer available, such as source code, system documentation, APIs, or programmers with experience in a 50-year-old computer system. In such cases, the only feasible solution may be to write a screen scraper which "pretends" to be a user at a terminal. The screen scraper might connect to the legacy system via Telnet, emulate the keystrokes needed to navigate the old user interface, process the resulting display output, extract the desired data, and pass it on to the modern system. (A sophisticated and resilient implementation of this kind, built on a platform providing the governance and control required by a major enterprise — e.g. change control, security, user management, data protection, operational audit, load balancing and queue management, etc. — could be said to be an example of robotic automation software.)
In the 1980s, financial data providers such as Reuters, Telerate, and Quotron displayed data in 24×80 format intended for a human reader. Users of this data, particularly investment banks, wrote applications to capture and convert this character data as numeric data for inclusion into calculations for trading decisions without re-keying the data. The common term for this practice, especially in the United Kingdom, was page shredding, since the results could be imagined to have passed through a paper shredder. Internally Reuters used the term 'logicized' for this conversion process, running a sophisticated computer system on VAX/VMS called the Logicizer.
More modern screen scraping techniques include capturing the bitmap data from the screen and running it through an OCR engine, or for some specialised automated testing systems, matching the screen's bitmap data against expected results. This can be combined in the case of GUI applications, with querying the graphical controls by programmatically obtaining references to their underlying programming objects.
Web pages are built using text-based mark-up languages (HTML and XHTML), and frequently contain a wealth of useful data in text form. However, most web pages are designed for human end-users and not for ease of automated use. Because of this, tool kits that scrape web content were created. A web scraper is an API to extract data from a web site. Companies like Amazon AWS, Google provide web scraping tools, services and public data available free of cost to end users.
Newer forms of web scraping involve listening to data feeds from web servers. For example JSON is commonly used as a transport storage mechanism between the client and the web server.
Recently, companies have developed web scraping systems that rely on using techniques in DOM parsing, computer vision and natural language processing to simulate the human processing that occurs when viewing a webpage to automatically extract useful information.
Report mining is the extraction of data from human readable computer reports. Conventional data extraction requires a connection to a working source system, suitable connectivity standards or an API, and usually complex querying. By using the source system's standard reporting options, and directing the output to a spool file instead of to a printer, static reports can be generated suitable for offline analysis via report mining. This approach can avoid intensive CPU usage during business hours, can minimise end-user licence costs for ERP customers, and can offer very rapid prototyping and development of custom reports. Whereas data scraping and web scraping involve interacting with dynamic output, report mining involves extracting data from files in a human readable format, such as HTML, PDF, or text. These can be easily generated from almost any system by intercepting the data feed to a printer. This approach can provide a quick and simple route to obtaining data without needing to program an API to the source system.
- Data munging
- Information extraction
- Importer (computing)
- Web scraping
- Mashup (web application hybrid)
- Comparison of feed aggregators
- Custom web crawlers and data scraping. Bot Gurus.
- http://www.fxweek.com/fx-week/news/1539599/contributors-fret-about-reuters-plan-to-switch-from-monitor-network-to-idn, FX Week, 02 Nov 1990[dead link]
- Yeh, Tom (2009). "Sikuli: Using GUI Screenshots for Search and Automation". UIST.
- "Diffbot aims to make it easier for apps to read Web pages the way humans do". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 1 December 2014.
- "This Simple Data-Scraping Tool Could Change How Apps Are Made". Retrieved 4 March 2014.
- Scott Steinacher, "DataPump transforms host data", InfoWorld, 30 August 1999, p55
- Hemenway, Kevin and Calishain, Tara. Spidering Hacks. Cambridge, Massachusetts: O'Reilly, 2003. ISBN 0-596-00577-6.