Second Hundred Years' War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Battle of Waterloo, 1815, where the Duke of Wellington and Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher defeated Napoleon. It is considered the final battle of the Second Hundred Years' War.

The Second Hundred Years' War is a periodization used by some historians[1][2][3] to describe the series of military conflicts between the Kingdom of England (later Great Britain and later still Great Britain and Ireland) and France (Kingdom, Republic and Empire regimes) that occurred from about 1689 to 1815. The term appears to have been coined by J. R. Seeley in his influential work The Expansion of England: Two Courses of Lectures (1883).[4]

Like the Hundred Years' War, this term does not describe a single military event but a persistent general state of war between the two primary belligerents. The use of the phrase as an overarching category indicates the interrelation of all the wars as components of the rivalry between France and Britain for world power. It was a war between and over the future of each state's colonial empires.

The various wars between the two states during the 18th century usually involved other European countries in large alliances; but except for the War of the Quadruple Alliance when they were bound by the Anglo-French Alliance, France and Britain always opposed one another[citation needed]. Some of the wars, such as the Seven Years' War, have been considered world wars and included battles in the growing colonies in India, the Americas, and ocean shipping routes around the globe.

The series of wars began with the accession of the Dutch William III as King of England in the Revolution of 1688. The later Stuarts, as converts to Roman Catholicism, had sought friendly terms with Louis XIV. James I and Charles I, both Protestants, had avoided involvement as much as possible in the Thirty Years' War; they, too, had sought peaceful terms with France during the seventeenth century. Charles II and James II had even actively supported Louis XIV in his War against the Dutch Republic. William III, however, sought to oppose Louis XIV's Catholic regime and styled himself as a Protestant champion. Tensions continued in the following decades, during which France protected Jacobites who sought to overthrow the later Stuarts and, after 1715, the Hanoverians.[5]

After William III, the opposition of France and Britain shifted from religion to economy and trade: the two states vied for colonial domination in the Americas and Asia. The Seven Years' War was one of the greatest and most decisive conflicts.

The military rivalry continued with British opposition of the French Revolution and the ensuing wars with first the new Republic and then the First Empire of Napoleon. His defeat in 1813 at the Battle of Leipzig, followed in 1815 by the Hundred Days and the second defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, effectively ended the recurrent war between France and Britain. However, Coalition goal of restoring French monarchy in the Treaty of Paris and preventing further revolutions in Europe[6] ultimately failed with the events of The European Revolutions of 1848. The recurrent rhetoric used in each country shifted from references to a "natural enemy" to an agreement to tolerate one another. Common interests led the two to cooperate in the Crimean War. A century after fighting one another, the two were able to establish the Entente Cordiale, demonstrating that the "first" and "second" Hundred Years' Wars were in the past; cultural differences continued, but violent conflict was over.

Contents

[edit] "Carthage" and "Rome"

Many in France referred to Great Britain as "Perfidious Albion," suggesting that it was a fundamentally untrustworthy nation. French people compared Britain and France to ancient Carthage and Rome, respectively, with the former being cast as a greedy imperialist state that collapsed, while the latter was an intellectual and cultural capital that flourished:

The republicans knew as well as the Bourbons that British control of the oceans weighed in Continental power politics, and that France could not dominate Europe without destroying Britain. "Carthage"—vampire, tyrant of the seas, "perfidious" enemy and bearer of a corrupting commercial civilization—contrasted with "Rome", bearer of universal order, philosophy and selfless values.[7]

[edit] Wars included in the extended conflict

[edit] See also

[edit] Footnotes

  1. ^ Buffinton, Arthur H. The Second Hundred Years' War, 1689-1815. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1929.
  2. ^ Crouzet, Francois. "The Second Hundred Years War: Some Reflections". French History 10 (1996), pp. 432-450.
  3. ^ Scott, H. M. Review: "The Second 'Hundred Years War' 1689-1815". The Historical Journal 35 (1992), pp. 443-469.
  4. ^ Morieux, Renaud: "Diplomacy from Below and Belonging: Fishermen and Cross-Channel Relations in the Eighteenth Century". Past & Present 202 (2009), p. 83.
  5. ^ Claydon, William III
  6. ^ British and Foreign State Papers, p.281
  7. ^ Tombs, That Sweet Enemy, p. 208.

[edit] References

  • Blanning, T. C. W. The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe 1660-1789. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • Buffinton, Arthur H. The Second Hundred Years' War, 1689-1815. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1929.
  • Claydon, Tony. William III. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited, 2002.
  • Crouzet, Francois. "The Second Hundred Years War: Some Reflections." French History 10 (1996), pp. 432–450.
  • Scott, H. M. Review: "The Second 'Hundred Years War' 1689-1815." The Historical Journal 35 (1992), pp. 443–469. (A collection of reviews of articles on the Anglo-French wars of the period, grouped under this heading)
  • Tombs, Robert and Isabelle. That Sweet Enemy: The French and the British from the Sun King to the Present. London: William Heinemann, 2006.
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages