Talk:17th Attack Squadron

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 17th Attack Squadron article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Intelligence / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References[edit]

Where are the references throughout the article? Could you point the out for me please? Adamdaley (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the section called references! If you are asking about inline references, that is totally different. If that is the case, the {{no footnotes}} template may be what you are looking for. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the inline citations? That is what I'm also saying "no" too in the "B class" assessment. Adamdaley (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No one is claiming that there are inline citations. However the article does have references. Why do you want two tags asking for inline citations? You could help more by adding a few inline citations rather then discussing the meaning of inline citations. For the record, this article does not meet my criteria for C class based on the condition of references. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have access to those materials for the article. Therefore, you could maybe do it? I have alot of things to do than explain myself while I'm trying to point out potential mistakes in the article which could become a better article instead of complaining to a Coordinator that he's making mistakes. It seems like you know more about the article than I do. Adamdaley (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't have access either except for the ones that are online and so do you. If there are mistakes in the article, then you should correct them and add the correct reference to show that the new material is correct. I sense that you are saying since the article lacks inline references it also has mistakes since you can not easily verify them. Is there a requirement anywhere that supports that position? Vegaswikian (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the "B class", in the WikiProject Military History. B1 says "Referencing and citations", that is what I said "no" too. Since there were no citations in the artcile from the listed References. Time to move on. 22:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)