Talk:2014 Farafra ambush

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Farafra ambush article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving 2014 Farafra ambush was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 July 2014.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 19, 2018, July 19, 2020, and July 19, 2023.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Template problems are misleading the user[edit]

I've temporarily taken out the image because I think it's misleading and actually makes it harder to find the data. This is clearly one attack near the border and there's no sense giving the impression that the whole region is in flames by marking the political subdivision rather than the location. What I want is to use a locator map to produce an actual dot (it was hard to notice, but we do link to the GeoHack of the exact coordinates in the infobox!) Problem is, Template:Infobox military conflict is impossible to figure out quickly. I have no idea why the marks don't show up, the documentation refers me vaguely to stuff that doesn't exist in another template, and the first dozen battles I tried looking up use only pretty pictures (or none) in this spot because apparently they can't figure out if it supports a location map either.

Can anyone quickly sort out how to do this with a proper location mark? I'm thinking this needs to be fixed in the template, maybe even in first-principles philosophy of how we code these locations. I mean, we have lots of special templates like Template:Infobox settlement with their own names and syntax for similar parameters. This is a damn mess. Wnt (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy.....[edit]

So where is the reference for "Israeli secret intelligence and gangsters,"?

Also, "weapon-mounted vehicles with machine guns".......this should read "vehicle mounted weapons", but could be left out entirely.

Nothing about an RPG hitting an ammo bunker.

And how does "and that bullet and heavy weapon casings were found at the site."[8] equal "and that heavy cast bullets were found at the site"[article]???

I'm kind of new to this.....I stick mainly with reference pages and not current events, so I didn't just edit. But I can't help but think "Accuracy"......accuracy and a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stretch0069 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]