Talk:238th Cavalry Regiment (United States)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 238th Cavalry Regiment (United States) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article rewrite[edit]

I rewrote the article using GlobalSecurity (the original source of the material) as a reference at Talk:E Troop, 238th Cavalry (United States)/Temp. The text itself is also changed so I'm pretty sure it is no longer infringing on the copyright.--Heno (talk) 23:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New article moved to mainspace. Thanks!--DO11.10 (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]