Talk:AOL search data leak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Internet (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Comment[edit]

There are two links to pages to search the logs. Does no one think a link to download them is just as valuable?Mastershake phd 07:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge page[edit]

I think this page should be merged into the main AOL article. Nobody is going to look up a specific crime of a corporation, unless it's a huge one (not that this isn't, just not big enough that it is its own topic). This article is almost stub-length, with verifiable data, and a single incident of a corporation. It should fit nicely into the AOL article. Smokeresearcher 02:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

It should never have been split in the first place. —Centrxtalk • 21:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I recommend keeping separate[edit]

I wasn't exactly clear about the scandal until i read the entire article. Because it is somewhat complex to explain, it may be too long to merge with AOL main article.

Ian 21:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree, but some barebones facts should be merged with AOL article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.121.77 (talk) 15:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree that it should be kept separate, since it's an example that is often studied by security, and privacy students. It does need more information, like the results of the FTC complaint, and the law suit. I don't have time to research them, but it would be interesting to have that information in here.mjlissner (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Additional material wished: internal consequences[edit]

I heard that, among others, the CTO of AOL had to resign due to this mishap. I think this is notable fact that should be mentioned (if it's true). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.92.177.35 (talk) 21:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Since done by others who proceeded me. Thank you for your suggestion. It was a good idea. --FeralOink (talk) 23:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

#14 is broken[edit]

but here is the correct link http://consumerist.com/2006/08/aol-user-927-illuminated.html dont know if I should update that or not so I'll just post that here. TinyEdit (talk) 21:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. This is really awful, the entire article, or rather, the subject matter... Anyway, I updated some of the other links too, as they'd changed.--FeralOink (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)