Talk:A New Philosophy of Society

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Metaphysics / Social and political / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Metaphysics
	Social and political philosophy
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Subject[edit]

This entry seems to be more about De Landa's applications of Deleuze/Guattari's concepts than about the concepts themselves. I've seen other applications of D/G and "assemblage" that look entirely different. I don't think this page is adequate (though I'm not sure exactly how to change it). Markwalters79 17:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, the subject of the article is a book by De Landa, not a concept. This was clear before you removed the lead, which I now restored. The book seems notable enough to have an article. --Elekhh (talk) 07:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with the first comment; in the absence of a page on Assemblage in any social science discipline (though it is increasingly used by geographers, anthropologists, philosophers, and so on) why have a page just referring to this book? It seems premature. If I hear no objections within a couple of months I will re-create the Assemblage (Philosphy) page, which was deleted as 'the concept is never explained' and use this page material to start the page, with De Landa's book as a reference. 194.80.178.1 (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]