Talk:Armadillo Run

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (0 participants)
Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (2 participants)
Sago Sago (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (2 participants)
Unreleased third Minecraft album (6 participants)
Kelly Metzger (7 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (11 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (10 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (8 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Cole Porter Method?[edit]

The section titled 'The Cole Porter Method' makes very little sense to me. The citation given is to an Armadillo Run level, which is hardly a citation at all. I did import the level into Armadillo Run, and observed a scenario where the armadillo is lifted up using cloth and a counter-weight. Is this the "Cole Porter Method" ? If so, why is it called that? If someone can clean this section up, that would be much appreciated. Thanks Afrank (talk) 17:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the "Cole Porter Method", whatever it is, nor the "Force", whatever that is, seem to have any place in this article [1], especially while unsourced. ~ Jafet (spam) 10:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this section twice per this discussion. It certainly doesn't make sense in its current form. I would recommend not adding this section back in without serious revision and some kind of justification here. Patrick O'Leary (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]