Talk:Bai Juyi

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry High‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

revert

Hi, I reverted this edit. Seems like a copy + paste ? Could someone please have another look on it ? One could use it perhaps to implement more details into the article (if source is clear). ----Erkan Yilmaz 21:37, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His name

Strictly speaking, Po Chü-i is not Wade-Giles due, at least, to the lack of tone marks. Dcattell (talk) 21:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wade Giles is Pai Chü-i, not Po. Po is W-G for pinyin Bo which is another legitimate pronunciation. 138.246.43.244 (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lexicographische Beiträge..., Volumes 1-3 By Erwin von Zach, Juyi Bai

http://books.google.com/books?id=ByxBAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA102&dq=inenggi+biya&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jLoMVLWaI8-1sQTiooLADA&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAzgo#v=onepage&q=inenggi%20biya&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 20:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Witter Bynner translated external link is either a broken or dead link

As above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:8082:9670:E554:5B87:DC8C:699C (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bai Juyi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalist POV

The exposition of Bai Juyi's views about the alleged harm caused by foreign influence on Tang culture does not maintain appropriate distance from them, so it seems that they are endorsed by Wikipedia. In modern discourse on culture, the views cited would be described by many as not only unrealistic, but also chauvinistic and xenophobic, and would hence be highly controversial. 62.73.72.3 (talk) 11:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]