Talk:Boßler Tunnel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hello, i started the article, yes it is machine translated. I can add the refs, but only when iM sure the article will remain, otherwise I have a lot of useless work. I live in the area and already visited the building site, read the newspaper. It is originally written by an traffic expert.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a good start, but it still needs a lot of work. In future, it might be better to start either in the "Sandbox" or to upload it paragraph by paragraph. I am a railroad enthusiast originally from the Tübingen area, and I am willing to support you on improving this article. Does your machine translation keep the references? Which programme did you use? NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello NearEMPTiness, yes you are right, it would have been better to work section by section. For translation i used google translator, but when the references are translated, they don't work any more, so i had to put them piece by piece. The article is in my opinion "oversourced". I saw your user name already in the German wikipedia. Help is always welcome, i'm not conceited. I was a very little co-worker on the German article and had conversation with the main author. Kind regards--Buchbibliothek (talk) 14:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much of this is simply incomprehensible (e.g. "2013 should be a dam between the bridge, it has already been completed on the country road 1214.[25] The bridge was completed the first building of the new line in 2011 [26] In early 2012 it was planned to begin after the Site investigation to propel mid-2013 [27]" ... To fix it requires working from the German -- what is the point of the English when it is not usable? Why not just delete it and add comprehensible translations as and when available? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.189.17.204 (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

==ASD nomination==

  • Keep. Stub article, translated from German Wiki. Nothing wrong with that, looks like a notable place, even if the article may need working on. Narky Blert (talk) 22:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many pardons, Narky Blert, but what are you talking about? What is ASD? This article is not nominated for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 00:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]
@John from Idegon: My apologies, I clicked the wrong link. Ignore me. Delete this section if you see fit. Narky Blert (talk) 11:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would like to work with you on this[edit]

Hi User:Buchbibliothek! I've done some work on this article to make the English more clear. So far I've:

  • Edited the lead section
  • Added info, a map image and a link to the infobox
  • Edited the first para of the "routes" section
  • Fixed some broken links, by adding |archivelink URLs to Wayback Machine archives.

I'm using the original German article as a reference, but comparison is sometimes difficult as I think you've moved some information around as well as translating. Are you still working on this article? If so perhaps we could work together. IMHO the original German is very information-dense, well researched and full of references, but isn't always very clearly organised. So, while I'd like to make the English read more easily, I'd particularly welcome your input, especially if you think that any revision I make distorts the original meaning.Ssptwriter (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ssptwriter, I do not work on the article at the moment. But your edits seem to improve the article. It was one of my first edits in enwiki, and it was very hard for me, very difficult. But Wikipedia is teamwork. Keep going.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 19:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boßler Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]