Talk:Bob McKeown

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Canadian football Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

College football

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

It is requested that an image or photograph of a headshot of the subject of the article be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

McKeown is most famous in the USA for the controversial confrontation he had with Ann Coulter on the 5th Estate.

I feel the following paragraph provides valuable information in explaining how McKeown is currently perceived in America.

In January 2005 McKeown was embroiled in controversy over an interview with American conservative polemicist Ann Coulter shown on CBC's The Fifth Estate. Coulter had argued that Canada's non-participation in the 2003 invasion of Iraq demonstrated that Canada's "loyal friendship" with the United States was weaker than in the past. She attempted to contrast the situation with the Vietnam War, stating, "Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam - was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?"

McKeown countered, "No, actually, Canada didn't send troops to Vietnam." Coulter asked if it was perhaps IndoChina where Canadian troops were sent and again McKeown rebuffed her. Neither Coulter or McKeown gave any ground in their assertions.

However, a Time Magazine article dated April 25, 2005, confirmed that "Canada did send noncombat troops to Indochina in the 1950s and again to Vietnam in 1972."

Big Daddy 16:47, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I found this great article on line that explains just how much IN BED WITH THE US, Canada was during Vnam (including our good friend PAUL MARTIN!) Check it out - http://auto_sol.tao.ca/node/view/771

In light of this, I made a slight edit to the previous insertion as follows:

"In January 2005 McKeown was embroiled in controversy over an interview with American conservative polemicist Ann Coulter shown on CBC's The Fifth Estate. Coulter had argued that Canada's non-participation in the 2003 invasion of Iraq demonstrated that Canada's "loyal friendship" with the United States was weaker than in the past. As part of her broader attempt to contrast the Canadian response to the Iraq war with that of Vietnam, Coulter asserted that "Canada sent troops to Vietnam." McKeown replied, "No, actually, Canada didn't send troops to Vietnam." Although Canada was "officially" neutral in the conflict, they did in fact send non-combat troops in support of US actions to both IndocChina and Viet Nam."

Big Daddy 18:17, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scare Quotes[edit]

Scare Quotes are not acceptable for an "encyclopedia." Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:19, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you allow their "use" all "over" the "place" in "the" Coulter/O'Reilly/etc etc articles??

Ps Quit stalking me! Big Daddy 18:46, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/BigDaddy777[edit]

For those interested, an RfC has been filed against User:BigDaddy777 at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/BigDaddy777. Your comments would be appreciated. -- 69.121.133.154 06:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coulter[edit]

Something should be said about how Coulter, though given the opportunity then and there, did not mention those facts. It is obvious to anyone who saw it that she did not know. It would also be incorrect to assume that McKeown didn't know them, as it was clear that they were talking about the Canadian government officially sending troops. They didn't. 70.53.108.105 (talk) 20:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bob McKeown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930170925/http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0008367 to http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0008367

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]