Talk:Born Again (The X-Files)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBorn Again (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBorn Again (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 15, 2011Good article nomineeListed
January 17, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 21, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that The X-Files star David Duchovny "detested" the episode "Born Again", despite appearing alongside his then-girlfriend Maggie Wheeler?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Born Again (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk contribs count) 11:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm production is a little lacking on this one, "Writer Howard Gordon was disappointed with the episode, finding it too similar to other series being aired around the same time. He also believed that the episode seemed "a little too cop show-y" overall, stating that he did not think it "was very well executed on any front". David Duchovny also reportedly "detested" the episode, despite a guest appearance by his then-girlfriend Maggie Wheeler." could really go in the reception section.. I gather you couldn't find much on production?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Like hens' teeth. I could comb over everything again to see what else there is to add, but most of the books are very sparse about this episode, and the Gradnitzer/Pittson book about shooting locations doesn't even list anything beyond the title. GRAPPLE X 13:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Its OK, shame though there isn't more coverage on production!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]