This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was move. Jafeluv (talk) 21:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Since the sources use Wade-Giles, we probably should too. But a redirect (and mention of the pinyin, for those who understand no other) would be good things too. SeptentrionalisPMAnderson 23:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Support. Check out the article's references. — AjaxSmack 21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Speculations as to his preferred Romanization are irrelevant. I support the move, however, for the same reasons Septentrionalis does. --Atemperman (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The current article has Chang Dai-chien meeting with Picasso in 1953. That claim is sourced and cited, but I've seen other mentions that the meeting was in 1956. Did they meet twice? Is one of the dates (1953 vs. 1956) erroneous (i.e., the cited source is in error, or other sources are in error)? --Quartermaster (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The works of Chang Dai Chien (as opposed to his forgeries)
The current article lacks such a section. Apart from being a master forger of the greatest painters of China,Chang was one of the greatest himself. Museums in Taipei and Beijing have the best collections of his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 04:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)