Talk:Club Filter Melbourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First of all, big apologies for making a series of errors here - I was composing the entry online, and not in sandbox, so speedy deletion got added before I finished the entry. Sorry about that!

Club Filter is (and was) Melbourne's longest running techno club, and had a lot of impact on the local scene there, on local producers and DJs, and brought many vital internationals to the city. You'll still see its influence cited on Aussie forum sites like In The Mix (http://www.inthemix.com.au) and Melbourne Beats (http://melbournebeats.com/) 4 years after the club closed.

I hope it's OK to leave as an entry on Wikipedia, but understand if you choose to delete it.

Respect, and apologies again, Nina

Nina, thank you for stating your case for 'notability. It will be reviwed in due course. However as per the warnings on your talk page don not remove Speedy Deletion tags - as you have now recieved your final warning.-- Rehnn83 Talk 10:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank YOU! And so sorry about those speedy deletion tags - I had no idea what they were; I just thought that they were automatic pop-ups, amateur that I am!! Advice noted. Cheers!!!!

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- Rehnn83 Talk 13:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...ah-hah... I see!!! Thank you again... Nina phunsta 15:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I think even though Nina doesn't know about Wikipedia conventions sufficient has been done to show notability. I have asked Nina if the free text references can be changed to actual citations - if dates are added to the references already in this article then multiple, non-trivial, reliable secondary sources are provided and this is clearly a notable institution.Garrie 01:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the advice - I'll add these details shortly! Really appreciate the feedback! Nina phunsta 04:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.inthemix.com.au/features/10457/Club_Filter_11_years_of_history_in_Australian_dance_culture -- Dannymars 10:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Club Filter.jpg[edit]

Image:Club Filter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Club Filter Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]