Talk:Exidy

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Bandido

Actually this game was never licensed from Nintendo, but was a bootlegged version of Sheriff. When the mameteam had the authorization to release the Xidy ROMs, also Bandido had to be in the list. But while writing the game pages for mamedev.org, we could find no evidence of any actual licence. We asked then to mr. Kaufmann regarding the matter and he confrimed that no actual licence was given by Nintendo. Sources: I was the one creating the pages for 5 games on mamedev.org, had to do also Bandido but while gathering informations we found discrepancies I asked Aaron Giles, that was at that moment team Leader of the MAME project, clarafications regardin the Bandido Licence s_bastian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.17.198.19 (talk) 11:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

What country were they based in? Phyte 21:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know the story of how Exidy ended up with the Sorcerer? The machine simply doesn't seem in keeping with the company itself -- the company did video games, yet the Sorcerer lacked sound, color, and by most arguments, graphics. It seems like it was designed by a 3rd party. Anyone know more? Maury 23:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used to work there, '78 to '79; as I understand it, the Sorcerer started as a way to keep the production line going steadily. Arcade-game production was always feast-and-famine: hire a bunch of production workers for a run of a few hundred units, and then lay them all off until the next run. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.174.149.170 (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain

They've recently started to release their games, one game at a time, into the public domain - see http://mamedev.org

user:Pzg Ratzinger

Exidy were based in Sunnyvale,CA. Icd (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sorcerer was developed by Howell A. Ivy, one of the owners and the chief Engineer at Exidy Inc. to diversify the product line and to capitalize on the emerging computer market. The technology of the computer was virtually the same as the video games, at that time. The Sorcerer utilized black and white monitors, due to the 512 pixels horizontal. The availability of color monitors of that resolution was not available at that time, at a price that the consumer could afford. The Sorcerer did use character generated graphics. However, each character could be user defined and if programmed properly, graphics could be of high quality and very detailed. Sound could be added by the S100 expansion card. Exidy was located in Sunnyvale, on Java Drive. And also in Mt. View.Scotty88 (talk) 02:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found a PDF of a catalog of theirs online, showing they were based in Sunnyvale as of 1980.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exidy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071231000817/http://www.thedoteaters.com:80/p2_stage1.php to http://www.thedoteaters.com/p2_stage1.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]