Talk:Congress for the Republic

Tunisia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tunisia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Tunisia. For more information, visit the project page.TunisiaWikipedia:WikiProject TunisiaTemplate:WikiProject TunisiaTunisia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Secular[edit]

Hi, I've removed secular as an identity for that party but You undo the changes.... Don't know why.... That party believes in the Arab & Islamic identity & believes that Islamic Sharia is a main source of laws, so it's not secular party.... Look to its principles & goals.... here: http://www.cpr.tn/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=100%3A-17-2011&catid=41%3Atextes-fondateurs&Itemid=70&lang=ar

so at least when we can make sure officially it's a secular party we can't make it a secular....

--elbarck (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the link you provided they state that they differentiate radically between belief (religious) and ideology and they consider the religious belief to be a personal freedom. I guess that qualifies as a sort of secularism. The reference to Islamic/Arab history is about identity. --Tachfin (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly :).... It accept all religions but under one identity which is Islamic/Arabic one.... If he said only Arab I would say it's a secular but he said Islamic identity, I can't see this by anyway as secularism or we'd consider Islamic Parties which have other religions inside it as secularism too like Muslim Brotherhood parties for example which believes in freedom of religion too even the vice president of the Muslim Brotherhood party is a christian :D.... --elbarck (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not us who decide this, but reliable sources as e.g. BBC and the Daily Telegraph. Your deliberations perfectly qualify for the definition of original research. As long as RS's tag the party as secular, it is secular for Wikipedia. Your own perceptions and analysis cannot change this. Thank you for your understanding. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's very weird, The Muslim Brotherhood Party in Egypt Freedom & Justice Party, its Vice president is a christian But BBC & Daily Telegraph consider it religious & not secular.... I think it's about their thoughts not the facts.... If you consider my argument & Wikipedia does, it should at least remove secular for further confirmation especially I put the link from the official web-site party NOT my opinion....--elbarck (talk) 05:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Congress for the Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140417060328/http://mottamar.net/ to http://mottamar.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Logo-cpr.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]