Talk:Connie Smith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Connie Smith has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
November 6, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Musicians (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject United States / Indiana / Ohio (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Country Music (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

Toolbox

See WP:DEADREF
for dead URLs

This review is transcluded from Talk:Connie Smith/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mr. R00t Talk 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

GA Criteria[edit]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: The prose is a tad bit long. Otherwise good.
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: - Sorry for the delay.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Very good.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: In the musical career section there really need to be more images. Only three images in the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Found another image on Flickr. Mr. R00t Talk 00:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Re: images, if three's all we have then that's all we can use, because they do have to be free ones. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I do know that. I'm going to look around for free images of her. Mr. R00t Talk 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Outcome[edit]

I've added this to the GA list. I've added the template. It is now a Good Article. Mr. R00t Talk 01:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Do the math[edit]

Wiki says Marty Stuart was born 1958. This article says Marty saw Smith perform 38 years prior to their 1997 marriage. 1997 - 38 = 1959. Accordingly, Stuart saw Smith perform (and told his mother that one day he would marry Smith) when he was 1 year old (1959 - 1958 = 1). I don't think so. This article and the one on Stuart need to agree. 184.18.199.68 (talk) 03:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)