Talk:Triple Canopy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Constellis Group)

Triple Canopy & Global Solution[edit]

Please provide sources for your claim that Triple Canopy is not a subsidiary of Global Solution, and also that it has no relationship whatsoever with the latter. The sources used in the article claim that Triple Canopy is a subsidiary of GS. Otherwise, this claim that 3D Global Solution was contracted by Triple Canopy (other way around). Tazmaniacs 12:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a horribly written article...[edit]

Made a few changes to the article, have a few more I may make. Someone teach these people how to be concise... I changed "loss of life of personnel" to "personnel casualties". Also, that was under the section named "Fatalities" (what is this? Mortal Kombat??)... might change it straight to "Casualties", that sounds better... Talk to me.



Okay yeah, a little while later and I just did some REAL editing... I hope I didn't f*** everything up, it's late where I am. Seems more professional, concise and accurate now... Deleted that part about the "Pakistani earthquake" because the source was messed and I couldn't find a legitimate correlation between the two.. Thoughts??

Constellis Group[edit]

The text of the article refers to Triple Canopy in the past tense and claims that it has since been rolled into Constellis Group. If this is the case, why does Constellis Group redirect to Triple Canopy rather than the other way around? Cryptophreak (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My guess: nobody has bothered to make an article for 'Constellis Group'. Which is understandable - it was formed only in 2014, primarily by a merger between Academi and Triple Canopy,[1] and doesn't appear notable in its own right. It's notability would come from one of these two now-subsidiaries. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, there WAS an article on Constellis - and it got AFD'd (without much discussion, though). PhotogenicScientist (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]