Talk:Credit Suisse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Crédit suisse)
Good articleCredit Suisse has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 24, 2013Good article nomineeListed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on May 21, 2014.

Monkey Business[edit]

Removed "of Monkey Business fame", this refers to the book Monkey Business : Swinging Through the Wall Street Jungle by John Rolfe, Peter Troob, it may be mentioned in a separate article about "DLJ". - Jerryseinfeld 22:47, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Company name[edit]

In the German version the name of the company is Credit Suisse AG. Credit Suisse search on Swiss commercial registers agrees with it. Any advice, thx, --YB ✍ 16:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then we may replace occurences of Credit Suisse Group by Credit Suisse AG and it would be a good idea to also change the title to Credit Suisse Group because it is an affiliated group. It would be interesting to list the members of the group (Credit Suisse Funds AG, Credit Suisse Group AG, Credit Suisse Trust AG...). --YB ✍ 16:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since no one disagree, I will modify the article. Thanks for your collaboration. --YB ✍ 22:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote the bulk of the article, but it was so long ago I don't remember the details of corporate structure/naming. However, I think we usually title articles based on how the person/org is commonly known as, or how they prefer to call themselves, as oppose to their technical legal name. So the method of decision-making would be to establish what high-quality secondary sources typically call them and then make any clarifications in article-space (I think). user:Crisco 1492 is a bit of an article-naming expert and may be able to provide more confident guidance. I've never had much interest in article-naming debates. CorporateM (Talk) 00:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's right, we expect articles to be under the commonly known name, rather than their legal names etc. Now, comparing "Credit Suisse AG" and "Credit Suisse" is difficult because one would necessarily include the other. We'd have to focus on what the RSes use to refer to the company. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just doing a quick search in The New York Times, which I think many of us consider to be one of the more reliable of the prolific news publications, all the articles just refer to it as "Credit Suisse", so I think the current article-title is correct. However, if it's not in there already, a Corporate structure-type section should clarify the difference between AG and Group and the divisions you referred to above, even if a primary source is necessary. If German-language sources show a preference for a different name, it may actually be optimal for different language Wikis to use slightly different titles. CorporateM (Talk) 00:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies) seems to confirm that the title is correct, but the article should specify the official name of the company. --YB ✍ 00:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The following two links are refering to the relevant information for this: Legal structure, Credit Suisse Group announces plan to evolve its legal entity structure --Albinfo (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After the acquisition, Credit Suisse Group AG was merged into UBS Group AG and UBS Group AG now owns Credit Suisse AG. Does it mean Credit Suisse Group AG ceased to exist, and should the name be changed to Credit Suisse AG? Concisepleonasm (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to the CS page linked in the 2023 thread below ("Credit Suisse Group AG was struck off the commercial register, and all assets and liabilities of Credit Suisse Group AG passed to UBS Group AG") as well as the link you provided, yes, although let's be aware that a simple search-and-replace is insufficient. The word "Group" is used in more than just the lead sentence. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 05:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Deutsche Bank: Delisting relevant?[edit]

At Deutsche Bank lead: "The company was a component of the STOXX Europe 50 stock market index[1] until being delisted on August 8, 2016.[2]"

I do not want to cause a panic here, but that source also mentioned this bank.. Maybe "STOXX Europe 50" isn't very relevant (on its own)? I hadn't heard of it (only troubles for DB..). Is it fair to list in lead there, and not at all here (not even in main text, maybe this bank is back on the list? Maybe I just missed it[1] see at least there "Investment Opportunities Credit Suisse FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN")? comp.arch (talk) 14:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Frankfurt Stock Exchange
  2. ^ STOXX. "STOXX Digital | STOXX Announces Component Changes To STOXX Europe 50 Index". www.stoxx.com. Retrieved 2016-08-16.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Credit Suisse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with UBS[edit]

Fast moving stuff - there may be no Credit Suisse by Monday. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/silicon-valley-bank-collapse-what-you-need-know-2023-03-15/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_campaign=Weekend-Briefing&utm_term=031823 I haven't edited - will wait for confirmation, probably later today. Thelisteninghand (talk) 15:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would imagine that by Monday's close, there may be neither CS nor UBS... RedSully (talk) 19:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A townhall is scheduled this morning 9am for UBS employees, more information may come in. At this point UBS states it's still business as usual https://www.ubs.com/global/en/media/display-page-ndp/en-20230319-tree.html Noxoug1 (talk) 00:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NODEADLINE.
Also, Credit Suisse just released a statement to their clients: Until the completion of the merger, which is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to be consummated by the end of 2023, Credit Suisse will continue to conduct its business in the usual way, in close collaboration with UBS. Thibaut (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should we add a ongoing event template to the page? Tescomealdeal1 (talk) 05:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Credit_Suisse&oldid=1206822294"