Talk:Dæmonicus

Dæmonicus has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Dæmonicus is part of the The X-Files (season 9) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
September 8, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dæmonicus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 03:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

with many commenting on its storylines --> Surely they would comment on its storylines. What did they say about them? Did they suck? Were they amazing?
- Done. TBran dl ey 05:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A few issues with overlinking and overnaming. For example, when someone's name is mentioned one, their last name should only be used then after.
- Done (At least, I think...).--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
TheXFiles.com should not be in italics, as it is not a magazine or other sort of published source.
- Done. TBran dl ey 05:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I got the other one.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Other than that, I see no problems with the article. Great work!

All issues have been addressed. Passing the article! Statυs (talk) 21:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dæmonicus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]