Talk:Derek Schmidt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Derek Schmidt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by COI editor?[edit]

On June 6th, 2019, an IP editor from downtown Topeka, where the state capitol and the Kansas Republican party headquarters are located, made extensive revisions to this article, removing well-sourced facts in what was almost certainly a blatant effort to present a POV positive impression of the article's subject. At one point, he or she added a source to the brief article and from it, Schmidt was given credit for a statement made by another Objections Board Member. The actual text from the source was:

Kobach said the delay shouldn't be interpreted as the board giving credence to claims that Obama isn't eligible, but as a signal it wants to build a more complete record. He noted that the board doesn't have any document certifying the authenticity of the copy of Obama's birth certificate that is available online. "We have to take our responsibilities seriously," he said. "Taking it seriously means that we make a decision with all of the evidence that can be obtained before we decide it."

The IP editor put the quote instead in Schmidt's mouth, perfuming the article's subject's situation. The edits began at 12:52 p.m. and lasted until 1:51 p.m. CDT. Much of the added material was derived from Schmidt's own state website, rather than from an RSS. One could reasonably presume these questionable edits were made by a COI editor, perhaps working on state time. The state board, by giving some deference to the claims, ignored the fact they had been endlessly unsuccessfully litigated countrywide by California crackpot dentist-attorney Orly Taitz in 2008 and earlier in 2012. Activist (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]