|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This article has an assessment summary page.|
|To-do list for Egyptian Arabic:|
|Threads older than 4 months may be archived by.|
I will give the editors of "Egyptian Arabic" one month to explain what "Egyptian arabic" is and use reliable sources to proof it, then I will start by first editing the name of the article and then use more verified content.
Wikipedia should be based on scientific facts built upon reliable and verified sources. Not wishful thinkings or legends used within minorities of diffrent religions and ethnicities. The arabic language is one language, then there is diffrent accents. Also the constitution of respective country should be put in consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamah12aa (talk • contribs) 21:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
It's not a language
To make it easier for you to understand, when an Irish person speaks English, he isn't creating a new language, he is speaking in English in a different accent
This is the same for Egyptian people, they speak Arabic with their own Accent.
This article is full of incorrect information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 10:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I am very surprised for not mentioning a very common and used plural suffix "-at" for things and "-een" for human and "-ean" for two things. ex: sittat, mudarseen(teachers(fem and male)), mudarsean(two teachers (fem and male)). Is there something I am not aware of, arent they for plural too? --MasriDefend (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Currently the article is repeatedly attacked by Uishaki who repeatedly changes scientific terms into politicized imprecise terms as the primary namings.   . See also WP:Edit-war, dialect, language, a language is a dialect with an army and navy, varieties of Arabic. I don't think Wikipedia should be a place where I have to explain what are the differences between a dialect and a language and when to use each. Currently, the article is precise and factual; each naming is cited at least in one source. The section Namings has all the names for Egyptian Arabic. Censoring the namings for "political reasons" is meaningless. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)