Talk:El Vallecito

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

"It is believed that Baja California had human presence for millions of years, however the available evidence indicates an occupation approximate from 8000 BCE.". Am assuming "millions of years" is a mistake.Tteske (talk) 04:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy[edit]

Saying that any site was occupied by humans for "millions of years" creates an instant credibility gap, so that one can hardly trust anything else this articles says. This is the kind of junk that gives Wikipedia a bad reputation. Most reputable sources would indicate Baja occupation for around 9000 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.96.25.141 (talk) 19:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on El Vallecito. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]