Talk:Empire of Illusion

Made page[edit]

The description of the contents of the book may appropriately be called overlong and in some conflict with WP:PRIMARY guidelines, but I do believe it does not misrepresent the source material in any significant way and thus avoids the usual major issues with WP:SYNTH. It's a fairly chronological description of the contents of the work that is broken up by each chapter. In that way, the text is easily verifiable. If this is an egregious sin that must be undone, I've made a similar exposition on book contents over in the Death of the Liberal Class page that might also be of interest for correcting. I, however, think they're all more or less okay; but I'm biased because they are my own beautiful works. Mewnst (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a danger of WP:SYNTH in what you've written. I believe the content section should include supporting references, even if some of them have to come from the book itself. Deb (talk) 08:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work.

North8000 (talk) 13:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]