Talk:Ficus opposita

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Ficus opposita is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Last edit about it capable of treating some kind of infection[edit]

Does a source about "traditional healing" count as realiable? Honestly, this is like consulting a homeopathic medicine book about its effectiveness. -ImmernochEkelAlfred(Spam me! (or send me serious messages, whatever you like)) 08:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why there is a redirect for Ficus aculeata to this species. Both Commonwealth Heads of Australian Herbaria (https://biodiversity.org.au/nsl/services/search?product=APC&tree.id=51209179&name=ficus+aculeata&inc._scientific=&inc.scientific=on&inc._cultivar=&max=100&display=apc&search=true )and plants of the world online (http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:852338-1 ) recognise Ficus aculeata as an accepted species. Can we change this so that Ficus aculeata has its own article, without problems??? MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]