Talk:Glossary of tensor theory

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The current definition of Cartesian tensors (oddly called "orthogonal tensors", which normally refers to something different) is incoherent. "In the presence of a tensor $\delta _{i}^{j}$ ...." The section on the Einstein summation convention should not that if we are not dealing with Cartesian tensors, one of the summed indices should be covariant and the other contravariant. The article Einstein notation is also inadequate here. --OinkOink 06:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I redid the Cartesian tensor section.--OinkOink 09:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 17:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cartesian tensors[edit]

This glossary has a fairly long paragraph on Cartesian tensors, which never gets around to attempting to say what they are. Can someone add that. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]