Talk:Grevillea robusta
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Silky Oak disambiguation
[edit]Hi all, just wondering what you think about putting in a disambiguation page for Silky Oak. I have been reading through old CSIRO technical bulletins, and it seems there are at least four other Australian tree species that have been called silky oak - it may be useful info for people researching old botanical records, history of timbercutting, cabinet timbers, woodworking, antiques, etc. BoundaryRider (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's a good idea, although I think that the primary topic for "silky oak" in worldwide use is Grevillea robusta. This could be handled by creating Silky oak (disambiguation) (in the manner of the Dogwood (disambiguation)) page and putting a hatnote on this article.--Melburnian (talk) 02:55, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I've made a start. There are more entries that can be added in the future as articles are created.--Melburnian (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class plant articles
- Mid-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- C-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- C-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles