Talk:Grotesque body

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Literature (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

A simple definition and solid examples, please[edit]

A definition of Grotesque Body should proceed anything else, as it would greatly improve this article.

We should put a definition before rushing forth to drop names like Bakhtin and Rabelais and Luttazzi to demonstrate how elite we are.

It's a "concept and literary trope", but what kind of concept and literary trope is it? Saying that something is a concept is almost as vague as saying that something is a noun.

This article should also include some solid examples of grotesque body.

I would a define groteque body, but I'm not quite sure what the simple definition is. LOLOLOLOBBQELEVENTYONEONEONE ahem —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doubledragons (talkcontribs) 18:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC) --Doubledragons (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Tidy up/ Confusing[edit]

One user found this confusing. I have to say this is or hopefully was pretty heavy stuff. I reworded some things, wikilinked some unclear terms and fixed referencing. The intangential concept was also somewhat explained in a similarly complex manner making comprehension of the literary node an intraversible task. Exactly. I think most users reading this be familiar with literature but i've used less taxing terms now. I for one hate dumbing down but i think the people who wrote the original have somehow accomplished the task of "smarting up". Hopefully it's a little clearer now. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 01:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Confulsing as all hell[edit]

What on earth is this article about? I read the title, and I see a rotting corpse with maybe one eye missing. Literary trope? Someone, please help. This sounds for all the world like a hoax article. InFairness (talk) 06:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Subtext[edit]

In the second paragraph, is this really the appropriate term? Aron7913 (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)