Talk:Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center

Environment: Sustainability Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Energy High‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Taylor County, Texas	Nolan County, Texas

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Self-promotion[edit]

Is this article really necessary? There is very little added to the information of location and size that would seem to merit a separate article. Furthermore, the main source is a company press release, which most of the article simply paraphrases. —Kerberos (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that most wind farms are notable. At 735.5 MW, this is a clearly notable wind farm - it was at the time of its construction the largest in the world. This wind farm is further notable due to the lawsuit against it. In fact, given your modus operandi, I would venture that it is the result of this lawsuit that is causing you to question this article's notability. It might need expanding a bit but it is definitely notable.

I do agree that the last (fourth) paragraph of the article reads as somewhat self-promoting and maybe should be removed. However the first two paragraphs are basic facts about the farm, and the third deals with the lawsuit - rst20xx (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surely every target of a suit doesn't merit its own article. The lawsuit is treated in the [Environmental effects of wind power] article. —Kerberos (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well no, but as I said, I think most wind farms are notable anyway, and the size of this wind farm also makes it very notable - rst20xx (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given your modus operandi? —Kerberos (talk) 00:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a general Wikipedia editor, who is here to improve the encyclopaedia and not just push a point of view on wind farms? Take it to AFD if you like - you'll lose - rst20xx (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You say that "most wind farms are notable"—that looks like a point of view to me, and your peevish replies to my comments look like you're pushing that point of view. If your idea of an encyclopedia is that it serve as a PR outlet for energy companies, so be it. —Kerberos (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think most wind farms are notable because I think most major structures, and certainly most major energy-providing structures, are notable - rst20xx (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the stats?[edit]

The largest wind farm in the U.S. can't even discuss its own efficiency? How much was the initial investment? What deals were made? How much usable enerby does it generate in a year? C'mon this is a STUB at best and political engineering at worst.--71.245.164.83 (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928084242/http://www.nawindpower.com/naw/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.335 to http://www.nawindpower.com/naw/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.335

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]