Talk:How to Be a Complete Bastard

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Notability

The book has been made or adapted with attribution into a video that was released into multiple platforms.
The book's author is so historically significant (well for brittish comedy at least) that any of his or her written works may be considered notable.
The book (and the videogame adaptation) has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works.

Enough? // Liftarn

I would think so. The notability guideline suggests citing such reliable sources to establish notability, instead of just listing them on the talk page. -- intgr ^#%@! 11:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But they are! However, I have now tidied up the references a bit so it should be clearer. // Liftarn

Ok, sorry, I didn't notice. Thank you for your efforts! -- intgr ^#%@! 12:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are very few references for the actual book, but then it was published in 1986 so it's pre-WWW. // Liftarn