Talk:ISO 259

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Judaism (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Writing systems (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

The transliteration used in the table aren't the same as with the ones provided in the file in the link. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Searching the online catalog at ISO website, I have not found any entry to a standard numbered 259-3. I have added this same comment in Talk:ISO_259-3. Please clarify. PedroLamarao (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of ISO_259-3 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ISO_259-3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO_259-3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Note: The outcome has implications for this article as well.
MisterGoodTime (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)