Talk:Indian 2000-rupee note

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian 2000-rupee note article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Languages with official status in India#Eighth Schedule to the Constitution|state level/other official languages]] The anchor (#Eighth Schedule to the Constitution) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Special:Diff/750752788[edit]

@14.139.196.2: This is an encyclopedia, such trivial and non-encyclopedic details doesn't belong here. See WP:NOTDIR. If you think there are some type of encyclopedic value of the content of the lists, please give any independent source that provide commentary on these details. — MBlaze Lightning ^T 13:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

language panel[edit]

@Hydloc009: You have repeatedly inserted this into a bunch of articles, the onus is on you to explain why it should be added, not on other editors to explain why it should not. As it happens, the stuff that you added has no encyclopedic value. They're inappropriate for an encyclopedia and doesn't belong here per WP:NOTDIR. — MBlaze Lightning ^T 17:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MBlaze Lightning: I came across you removing the languages from the articles of ₹10, ₹20, ₹50, ₹100, ₹500, ₹1000 and ₹2000 banknote articles.

The language panel shall be in the banknote articles - because just as security features of a banknote is listed on any banknote article, the language panel (17 languages on Indian banknotes) should also be listed on Indian banknotes article - as it is one of the features of the Indian banknotes. The languages are not a directory, they are in the language panel on reverse of the banknote - a feature of the banknotes. Thank you, Regards. Hydloc009 (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider them adding in main article[edit]

1. No new security features ^[1]

2. 2000 Rupee note is a temporary measure ^[2] ^[3]

--Swami16 (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "No time to add new security features in notes, says official". The Hindu.
^ "Rs 2,000 notes a temporary arrangement, will be ultimately withdrawn: RSS ideologue". Business Standard India. 13 December 2016.
^ http://www.heronewsonline.com/new-notes-of-rs-500-and-rs-2000-are-a-temporary-measure/. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2000 રૂપીસ[edit]

2000 117.228.86.238 (talk) 06:57, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False information[edit]

Notes were distributed before 8th November 2016 122.162.217.36 (talk) 14:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

01615881839[edit]

Moinuddin 58.145.189.245 (talk) 07:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moinuddin[edit]

Suvarna sir 58.145.189.245 (talk) 07:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000rupai nhi aayai account me[edit]

sikar 61.1.23.187 (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "No time to add new security features in notes, says official". The Hindu.

[2] "Rs 2,000 notes a temporary arrangement, will be ultimately withdrawn: RSS ideologue". Business Standard India. 13 December 2016.

[3] ttp://www.heronewsonline.com/new-notes-of-rs-500-and-rs-2000-are-a-temporary-measure/. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]