|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inflation article.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4|
|Inflation has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Society. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as C-Class.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Inflation is perhaps best explained using RtNmP
Inflation, when you change your observer viewpoint from rock-bottom or stellar heights to neutral mid mode level, is nothing more than a re-calibration onto the mid-mode operating neutral between rock-bottom & stellar high. It is the mean sum-product return to neutral of each and every platform that pertains to that valuation, when you subtract the increment. Lot´s of people have a tendency to multiple that out (Divide that out), however it is not a multiplication process, inflation being an addicion and not a percentage, due succesive depletion & saturation product cycles where that never returns to neutral untill there is a paper devaluation.
- ∑∏(midmode operating point)/N
- amplitude return to zero
- amplitude return to neutral
- transistor operating point biasing
- small signal model analyses
- neutral buoyancy
- push-pull output
- closed loop recirculation systems
Economy is a sum-zero game, and a sum zero game is inherently a small signal onto a neutrally biased operating point.
(ps: don´t start with your eternal internal robotic heckling about original research et all. All you need is a capacity to think through the terms mentioned above). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 12:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Why is this included as one of the negative effects of inflation? Isn't it just a tad circular to argue that inflation is caused by inflation?
little change, money supply growth
Hello, i proppose to change the second sentence: "Economists generally believe that high rates of inflation and hyperinflation are caused by an excessive growth of the money supply. However, money supply growth does not necessarily cause inflation." in: "However, money supply growth does not necessarily cause inflation from a more distinguished sight." or "However, money supply growth does not necessarily cause inflation from another point of view." Or something like that, cause the common definition of Inflation doesnt fit with the meaning of the sentence now (in my opinion). I dont know what this sight is intended to be, but when I imagine a pool of comparable units spread over the world and every unit is bound in a certain way with all assets, then i believe any rise of the number of units (along with a constant number of assets) will have the äquivalent effect of inflation. sry my english, greetings from austria --220.127.116.11 (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Any of you good folk have IQ´s above 100? I ask, because you do have such a large tendency to use the same terms that you are explaining to explain the term that you are describing and thereby and through fall foul onto a circular definition where poop is poop because it is poop.
Europe wasn´t cash starved in world war II, nor I, nor EVER, it was starved of trust relationships onto a pertinent sustaining future where THE economic unit REMAINED purchasing parity sustaining.
In very clear terms, they had a lack of pertinent trust in aristocrats, governments, and the quote subsidian wellfair onto aristocrats to sustain their offspring through having mated with their own sisters.
Do attempt to use at least a modicum of highschool third to last grade thought capacity, no matter, if you where a flunky then, just as you are a flunky now. Being GIVEN a high end function because your daddy married his sister and had you, doesn´t imply that you have what it takes, it applies that your daddy seeked out where to place you, in the hope you would NOT marry your sister (or brother).
Stop the foolish pretense in the presumption that cash has valoration, it doesn´t, it´s paper snippance that are in a direct symbolic relationship to current and past do, having accomplished, being concretely direct.
Review some historical movies if you like, the ones where a furr coat goes for five pence, due the bearer having been shot attempting to purchase their way with gold, silver, in times of famine.
Lousy times these, when the ohhh so alleged educational system is shown to have been ohhh so lacking in education.