Talk:Isopogon latifolius

A fact from Isopogon latifolius appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the wildflower Isopogon latifolius (pictured) is the showiest of the drumstick genus Isopogon?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isopogon latifolius.

Wikipedia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Western Australia / Biota Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Isopogon latifolius is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Manual data fix needed[edit]

@MargaretRDonald: the map is wrong. All occurrences outside Western Australia muct be cultivated plants. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Casliber: (Not necessarily - may be naturalised...) But I will fix. MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removed until fixed. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not naturalised. it can barely stay alive in gardens on the east coast, let alone go weedy. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A new map has replaced the old one, but everything may take a little time to sync. PS I have now checked the east coast occurrences which were all, as you said, cultivated. Curiously, the SA occurrence detailed the habitat (stringybark forest) in which it was found! MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]