Talk:Jab We Met

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeJab We Met was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Soundtrack[edit]

"Studio Album" refers to albums recorded by an artist or band, this is a feature film soundtrack, please refer to Template:Infobox_Album. Kotakkasut (talk) 12:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free fair-use images[edit]

I noticed that this article has 6 non-free fair-use images being used. This is a bit too high for the non-free criteria. May this aspect please be addressed? Mspraveen (talk) 09:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Excellent article. Just a few comments.

  • As mentioned on the talk page, too. many (6) non-free Images
  • Are these sites reliable (I do not know much about movie sites. So please forgive me)
  1. http://www.apunkachoice.com/
  2. http://www.nowrunning.com/
  3. http://www.businessofcinema.com/
  4. http://india-forums.com/
  5. http://www.indiaglitz.com/
  6. http://www.glamsham.com/
  7. http://www.bollyvista.com/

The prose is excellent, atleast for a GA.

Thanks, Kensplanet (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few comments more from my side.
  • I feel that the Production section is much smaller than I would expect for an article of seemingly such high prominence.
  • The last paragraph from the Production section seems to fall under the Release section (as per the style guidelines and might be shifted there. This will bring the production section down to two paragraphs and IMO is too small for an article that has received a lot of media coverage.
  • The DVD section may be merged with the release section as per the style guidelines again
  • The awards & nominations section may be shifted to the reception section as it is quite appropriate there. Condensing it from tabular format to textual format will be good.
Hope these aspects are considered as well. Mspraveen (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've taken most of this into account. Universal Hero (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I only see the awards and nominations being shifted to the Release section. (I've struck off the addressed aspects). Once again, the article lacks comprehensiveness in the Production aspects. The Release section, IMO, is broad enough for a GA though. P.S.: The questions raised by User:Kensplanet aren't addressed as yet. Thanks for your work so far. Mspraveen (talk) 02:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, MS, you're right - too much info is lacking. The production section is messy, and such important details as casting, filming, can be described in further depth. That's considering the fact that it is a new film, and there shouldn't be any problem with expanding and sourcing it. Shahid • Talk2me 22:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments
    • It has been around a week. I think there are too. many issues currently to promote this article. The nominator has not returned to any of my reliability issues. Actions and replies in a GAN and FAC should be swift. Thankyou, Kensplanet (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indiafm[edit]

Most of the Indiafm links I checked are dead links and one for a review doesn't provide review just info about the film. Maybe they reorganized their site. These will have to be updated. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Jab We Met. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jab We Met. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jab We Met. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jab We Met. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 August 2021[edit]

Please rollback the last two edits made by V.siddhesh (talk · contribs), namely 1 & 2.

User is clearly not aware of MOS:LASTNAME and has made changes across the article. They have been informed but haven't self-reverted. 2405:201:4013:80F3:E075:7DD:66B:1FB2 (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. That part of the MOS deals with the article subject, and even states For fictional entities, use common names. For example, Jason, Luigi, and Wesker.. One can assume the first names of the characters of a romantic comedy are their common names. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Imtiaz Ali's Next Project" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Imtiaz Ali's Next Project and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Imtiaz Ali's Next Project until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-relese in 2023[edit]

Jab We Met is re-released in theaters right now. there are several articles about it, can someone add notes about that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.220.230.81 (talk) 07:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jab_We_Met&oldid=1204967936"