Talk:Joshua Project

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

untitled[edit]

like SIL Ethnologue for languages, also a Christian proselytization outfit, it turns out that we often end up with JP's figures as the best or only readily available estimates for the populations of obscure ethnic groups. --dab (𒁳) 14:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources discussing it[edit]

See this RSN discussion. And this "Despite the technicaJ explanations and elaborate coding rubric, the underlying framework reflects the persistence of scientific racism and discredited anthropological classification systems. As a result, one theologian laments that the 10/40 Window concept and people group research are based on outdated anthropology, poorquality geography and questionable theology, and comments that this combination has become "another colonial burden that has to be borne" (Rynkiewich 2007, 225)." That's not in 10/40 window nor is this. Doug Weller talk 18:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]