Talk:Judith McNaught

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This is the second article I see about a Romance writer with the tag about "notability". I am not the author of this one, either, just a translator into Spanish, because this article is about a writer translated to other languages, which I think is a fact relevant enough to consider interesting this bio. I don't know if it is a problem with references. But they are easily found in many webs about this literature sub-genre. I don't want to think that it has something to do with being a writer read mainly by women. It is not that what makes you doubt about this article's notability, is it?--Joanenglish 02:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've found at least four today, all marked by the same guy. I know none of them had adequate sourcing, but that is not a reason for a notability tag. I left a message on the guy's sourcepage echoing your comments. Hopefully that will stop the tagging. If you see any others, feel free to let me know and I'll try to improve the sourcing on those articles so we can remove the tags. Karanacs 21:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Judith McNaught. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Judith McNaught. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]