Talk:KCOY-TV

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

News Channel edit war[edit]

I have watched an IP and an experienced editor war over the inclusion of the wikilink to News Channel. My 2¢. While it is a poorly sourced article being linked to, it is appropriate to link under a slogan because the article is a discussion about other stations USING that slogan in their promotion. Its as appropriate in this article as another station calling themselves Eyewitness News. I'm not sure why the MOS would prevent such an appropriate wiki link. Before you revert this edit again, use this space to explain. Trackinfo (talk) 02:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Under the principle that the title itself does not contain a wikilink, it is inappropriate to have one here. If that were a link to an article about the specific KCOY-TV article (like News Channel (KCOY-TV show)), then it would make sense. But its the same reason why we would never link news in a title or quotation--that link is not a part of the title itself, so adding the link is changing the actual title. This general principle is that we want minimal change in quotations; a title is essentially the "quotation" of part of the show. However, I'd be happy to raise the issue on WT:MOS, if you like. Please note that I was not "throwing my weight around"; instead, I'm doing the same thing every other editor is supposed to do when they see something that is incorrect, doesn't match our formatting guidelines, needs more info, whatever--I tried to fix it. Had you approached me on the subject at any time, like you did here, I would have responded (assuming I saw the post; I do miss things on occasion). Do you wish to raise this issue at MOS? Note that should consensus say that the links are fine, I'll revert myself. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are stretching the bounds to label a slogan as a quote, in order to qualify your edits under the section of MOS. What this wikilink does is connect this single TV station to the mass usage of a particular slogan. I'm sure there could or should be an article about the incestuous and repetitive use (or complete lack of originality within the broadcasting business) of such slogans, but the currently uncontested point (since I don't know this, I won't call it a fact yet) is that this and many other stations did use the slogan (not a quote). The linked article shows the mass usage of this slogan. Somebody put some work into this. From what I read, its not a hoax or a misstatement of facts. Within the bounds of my knowledge as a professional in this business, its accurate. So you are stretching the definition to place this under the MOS, then using that MOS to repeatedly hide this information. That seems more like you instituting your POV into what the world is allowed to know. Uh, that's a bad thing. Trackinfo (talk) 04:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I answered the basic idea on my talk page; I'll raise it at WT:MOS later, as it may well be that my interpretation is wrong. In fact, I don't even care if you add it back in now while we're discussing the issue. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Station slogans[edit]

Since Trackinfo insists that the slogans are accurate, I have stopped reverting. Instead, I have tagged the section as needing references. In a while (a few weeks at a minimum, could be longer if I don't remember), anything that isn't sourced will be removed per WP:V. Especially for slogans from the 80s, we simply must have verification that these were the actual slogans used. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KCOY-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]