Talk:Kuafu

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template removed[edit]

If someone thinks Kua Fu was part of the Chinese space programme, please detail their reasons here. Otherwise I'll stick by my decision to remove it. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 11:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 April 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 18:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kua Fu → Kuafu – The single-word name appears to be the trend per Google ngram. Most of the Chinese mythological characters e.g. Pangu, Fuxi, Shennong, Cangjie, Hebo... use the 1-word form on en.wp. Timmyshin (talk) 17:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - both spellings are common, but as pointed out by nom, the Wikipedia convention is to prefer the single-word version. -Zanhe (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.