Talk:Little Fishing Creek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in Little Fishing Creek[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Little Fishing Creek's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "annals":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 18:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 17:06, 03 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am Carbrera, and I'll be reviewing this article for possible good article submission.

Full review coming very soon. Carbrera (talk) 17:06, 03 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

  • Looks good; I usually have to add suggestions for the infobox!

Lead[edit]

Paragraph 1[edit]

  • You used "in" three times in the first sentence; could you replace with different words to end any repetition?
  • I don't know of any less awkward way to write it. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph 2[edit]

  • What is the Greenwood Valley? You mention it, but in the way it sounds like the reader should already know what that is
  • It's just a valley? Tweaked word order slightly, though. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please provide a link for "Pennsylvania Route 42"
  • Done.
  • Again, you used "in" three times in the third to last sentence; anyway to replace these words?
  • Done.

Paragraph 3[edit]

  • What is an "Exceptional Value Stream"?
  • Plus, should "Exceptional Value Stream" be in all CAPS?
  • It's an official designation, hence the title case. Specifically, the highest level of protection available in PA. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reword the last sentence to be "Little Fishing Creek contains parts that are suitable to canoe on." Does that sound any better?
  • Reworded.

Course[edit]

Paragraph 1[edit]

  • Nothing here; great work!

Paragraph 2[edit]

  • There's no link for Columbia County here; care to add one?
  • Okay.

Paragraph 3[edit]

  • This is way too short; please just take it and add it to the previous paragraph
  • I don't really think it fits with the previous paragraph, unfortunately. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tributaries[edit]

  • You use "of" three times in this sentence couldn't "of the Little..." but switched into "on the Little..."? Let me know what you think...
  • Reworded, but not in that way.

Hydrology[edit]

  • The last two paragraphs (sentences) of this section should be added elsewhere because it looks like a list; WP is not a list
  • Some paras merged, which is I guess what you're suggesting.

Geography and geology[edit]

  • Once again, could some of the the statements in this section be added to other paragraphs? I'm sure they could
  • Done.
  • Otherwise, another good section! :)

Watershed[edit]

Paragraph 1[edit]

  • The link for "quadrangle" should be used in its first mention; it is currently used in its second mention
  • I'm aware of it, and it's a tricky problem to solve. If I do what you suggest, then there are two links immediately adjacent to each other, which I'm pretty sure is also frowned upon. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph 2[edit]

  • Reword to "The watershed of Little Fishing Creek is long compared to its width", removing "fairly"
  • Reworded, but not in that way.

Paragraph 4[edit]

  • Remove the link to "Pennsylvania Route 42"
  • Done, but not sure exactly why.
  • Remove the link to "Sullivan County"
  • Likewise.

History, industries, and etymology[edit]

Paragraph 1[edit]

  • "on August 2, 1979. Its identifier in the..." → "on August 2, 1979; its identifier in the..."
  • Why? Neither sentence is overly short, and that makes it a one sentence paragraph, which is also frowned upon.

Paragraph 3[edit]

  • Is the inclusion of the links for all of the bridges really necessary?
  • Um...there are only three. All of these have WP articles. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Biology[edit]

  • Again, please try to combine some of the statements in this section because they are too short and look like part of a list
  • Done.

Recreation[edit]

  • Looks good! ;)

End of GA Review:[edit]

Looks like a very good article and surprising interesting. I would prefer that parts of the article be combined so it doesn't look like a list. I will put this article on hold for seven days. Thanks! Carbrera (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Carbrera: Thanks, I've responded to all of your comments. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jakec: After reading the text again it makes sense. Thanks for your edits! Carbrera (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 22:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Fishing Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Fishing Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]