Talk:Locally finite collection
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Having a collection of exercises is inappropriate for an encyclopedia, and breaks the uniform appearance and style. I quote from User talk:Topology Expert#Exercises in articles
- "I removed the "Exercises" section of the local finiteness articles because it is a longstanding agreement that exercises do not belong in encyclopedia articles. The content criterion is located at the policy page WP:NOT: specifically, Wikipedia is not a textbook. All information from the exercises is now contained in the article itself. A reader wishing to test his or her knowledge may still do so, but the article cannot designate these special parts of the text as exercises. silly rabbit (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)"
Oded (talk) 05:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. These might belong on wikibooks, but they are wholly inappropriate to an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor a textbook. JackSchmidt (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
"Local finiteness" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Local finiteness and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Local finiteness until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)