Talk:Marg Helgenberger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recent edits[edit]

I don't know what happened to this article in the last day or so but it somehow turned into a POV, non-wikified, incomplete article. I reverted back to the last good edit which appeared to be back on February 5. 23skidoo 04:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

marg helgerberger[edit]

Wasn't she married to the man who plays John Locke on LOST? Where can I find a photo of them together? Chloemalone@bellsouth.net70.152.177.230 17:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like what I've added?[edit]

Hi guys! I've just signed on the Wikipedia and added some new stuff here today. I just thought that there was alot more about Marg than was on here so I added it. And I promise everything on here is true. I hope you guys like it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ray-ray150294 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Marg Helgenberger stared in the 1996 movie 'Frame by Frame'.[edit]

Don't know why this was left off her Bio Page. She had top billing on the production poster and second billing in the Credits.

Couldn't be because of her two nude scenes? Movie not yet on DVD but is available on VHS. Worth watching. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greenergrass51 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I remember another nude scene[edit]

IIRC, there was a very short nude scene in "Species"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.103.117.254 (talk) 10:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1994 movie called "Keys", starring Marg Helgenberger and Gary Dourdan[edit]

I recently found a movie named "Keys" from 1994 that Marg Helgenberger starred in. I have no idea how to add it to the filmography list. I think it needs to be there since it is quite a good movie. If someone can follow that up and add it, it would be aprreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.213.63.246 (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article dispute[edit]

I take issue with this being in the article:

"Helgenberger scored another big break when she snagged the co-starring role of Catherine Willows, a former show girl employed as a blood spatter analyst on the CBS drama CSI: Crime Scene Investigation."

She wasn't a former 'show girl' she was a former stripper.. They are differences between the two.

The CSI page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSI:_Crime_Scene_Investigation refers says:

"She supported herself through college by working as an exotic dancer."

This wiki page refers to her a exotic dancer too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Willows

"Catherine left school and began work as an exotic dancer, in order to support her boyfriend's career and rock 'n' roll lifestyle."

But further down the page when quoting the character's original CBS biography (which has since been removed) it refers as a 'dancer/stripper'

"Willows herself worked for a time as a dancer/stripper"


imdb refers to her as exotic dancer here: http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0011010/bio


From TV Tropes, http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CSI

"In fact, Catherine Willows is a former stripper,..."


From Wikia Entertainment http://csi.wikia.com/wiki/Catherine_Willows

"Catherine herself worked for a time as a dancer/stripper..."


There was one episode where she went back to where she use to work. It was a bar that had ladies dancing and taking off their clothing. That is a stripper.


The wiki page for exotic dancer is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_dancer

The wiki page for stripper is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stripper

Exotic dancer is wrong too but I think it is better and closer to what she did. Does anybody have any objection to show girl being changed to stripper? Or at least 'exotic dancer' ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.228.175 (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What difference does any of this make? You are all referring to the fake job of a fake TV character. Y'all sound like a bunch of nerds arguing over D & D or Pokeman stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.243.2.77 (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life Inaccuracies[edit]

This article starts with the statement "Spouse(s) [steven seagal] 1996-1997", but then goes on to state that she was married to Alan Rosenberg in 1989 and has filed for divorce in March 2009, as reported in the media. I believe the declaration of her having been married to Mr. Seagal to be incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat hillary (talk • contribs) 18:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obligation to update?[edit]

As of June 1, 2011, the article says that she is currently filming a movie that another wikipedia article says was released in 2008. Okay, I guess someone, back in 2008, edited the article at time when Ms. Helgenberger WAS in the filming of that movie. But if you put the word "currently" in a wikipedia article aren't you obligated to come back later on, when the events being reported are NO LONGER "current", and change the edit? Wouldn't it be better never to edit with the word "currently" in the first place, but just to write "as of MMMM d, 2008, she is acting in the film Such-and-Such..." so that the information you're typing never goes out of date?170.170.59.138 (talk) 02:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Christopher L. Simpson[reply]

I removed the dated material since it is covered/mention below. Yes, ideally the article should be "timeless" or whatever the guideline is :)....--Threeafterthree (talk) 03:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conan: Red Nails[edit]

As this has yet to see the light of day, is it worth mentioning? It's not even an IMDB credit at this point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.66.0.247 (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drag Race appearance[edit]

For the Filmography table:

---Another Believer (Talk) 00:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marg_Helgenberger&oldid=1215931922"