Talk:Mook (publishing)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

English?[edit]

Am I the only one who thinks this word doesn't exist in English in this meaning? - https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=mook&geo=US a few hundreds of request in a year, most of them not connected to this definition - appears in "French" - vast majority of usage is in "French" - only source saying it's used in English claims it's from Japan Cr0vax (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are four reliable sources, as well as the Random House Unabridged Dictionary. If you're referring to the Garland Cannon essay, it says "English took mook as a Japanized English item in about 1988." Its origin does not make it any less of an English word. Nick Number (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]