Talk:NSB El 17

NSB El 17 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 29, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 20, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:NSB El 17/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 16:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

The sentence "The units were ordered to be used on the intercity Bergen, Dovre and Sørland Lines, but was plagued with technical faults." needs to agree as in "were vs. was".
In sentence "The locomotives have a 3,000 kilowatts (4,000 hp) power output and a 240 kN (54,000 lbf) tractive effort, allow the locomotive to haul a six-car train.", "allow" should be "allowing".
The link for shunting needs to be disambiguated.
The sentence "Tractive effort is 240 kilonewtons (54,000 lbf)." is short and should be combined with the prior sentence.

I am placing the article on hold. ---Dough 48 72 16:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for the review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 16:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass the article. ---Dough 48 72 16:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]