Talk:Of the Subcontract

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 2015.

Article's title has an interesting style, but is clear. Lead paragraph is the extent of the article and thus is not really effective. Improve the lead by adding more content below it. Free of grammar errors.

Article meets NPOV, NOR, and V criteria. Wikilinks are not used at all. References are reliable sources so article has notability. Using an image of the cover or one of the poems would be a great idea. Great use of the info box. No external resources used. Overall, looking good. Mazurr15 (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has a clear and memorable title. I can see you are still working on this and that the lead paragraph is not very strong yet.

Work in progress[edit]

Definitely a great start, but is the title formatted correctly... I think the source code should be ="Heading"= it looks like you're using Heading"' instead. I like the information chart though. Phoenix5100 (talk) 21:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the formatting, and the chart, but the brevity of the article is something that needs to be addressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmarshon97 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good start, not far off from the correct format. I think the only obvious problem with this article is the lack of information. You may look to include more specific information based on the content of the book, and what each of the contributors added to "Of the Subcontract." Roo9820 (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]