This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (this is a quite often asked question and searched and this article has good resource and references to be retain. thanks!) --Mzhosen (talk) 11:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all, including User:Rovine. I'm not sure this article should be deleted. The subject seems good. What it needs, in my view, is serious copy editing, a bunch of good references to support the prose, and consensus here that only online shopping organizations with Wikipedia articles should be allowed. Otherwise, this will turn into a spam magnet. Maybe it will anyway, but a few watchers and an invisible message should help. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I also think this article should be kept. Maybe we should establish a guideline for which sites can be allowed on this article? George8211 / T 10:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that including websites with WP articles would work if we link to their articles instead of their website. Bikroy.com is the only one that was included in the long list. There were internal links to Dutch Bangla Bank and BRAC Bank, but adding banks seems to be stretching the scope IMHO. If one could be found, an external directory of relevant sites could also be considered. Apparition11Complaints/Mistakes 13:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]