Talk:Pahonia/RFC

RFC: Pahonia[edit]

This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

{{rfc|soc|hist}} Should the Pahonia article be made into a redirect or a disambiguation page, as described below? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A. Make Pahonia a redirect to Coat of arms of Lithuania, and move any information from Pahonia that is not in the coat of arms article into the coat of arms article.

B. Make Pahonia into a disambiguation page with 2 or 3 targets.

C. Leave as is.

Survey[edit]

A. (If anyone needs reasons why, see here) --Itzhak Rosenberg (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C. Leave as is. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 14:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Threaded Discussion[edit]

I think that sections and information from Pahonia about Belarus (e.g. section "Belarusian Democratic Republic" and information related with Belarus from section "1990–present") should be moved to National emblem of Belarus, not Coat of arms of Lithuania. Section Coat of arms of Lithuania#Belarus is enough to describe the brief history of the Belarusian CoA. I don't think that it would make sense to have a section "Belarusian Democratic Republic" in an article about the CoA of Lithuania. -- Pofka (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to the main discussion[edit]

The RFC should provide the reference to the previous and actually the main part of this discussion, where the community didn't agree with the proposal solutions: Talk:Coat of arms of Lithuania#Merging the Belarusian Pahonia and Lithuanian Vytis together?. There are provided the main arguments against the proposed solution, and I don't really see any new sound arguments from the initiators, which, in my opinion, is very close to the behavior described in WP:LISTEN. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]