This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
It may be a stretch to include this article (which only tangentially involves horses, as the articles of purchase) in the equine project.--Miniapolis (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to take it out. I just thought that it might be interesting to people interested in horses. Not a big issue for me either way.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When you put it that way, who knows? You may be right, so it's fine with me if it stays in all four projects.--Miniapolis (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Manuscripts that tangentially mention horses are not really within WP Equine's scope. If we tagged every article that mentioned horses or stables, we would have half of the articles on wiki in our scope :) Dana boomer (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
