Talk:Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Environment

This environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment

Energy

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy

Biased?

This article seems somewhat biased to me. "The book clearly summarizes in just 120 pages...new technologies and programs that are already working amazingly well and that obviously could be rapidly scaled up..." All accurate, perhaps, but it just seems so glowing to me. Then it goes on to try to argue for him that his solutions are relatively cheap. I not sure the mini-bio really belongs here either. -- General Wesc (talk) 01:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, very biased. I think it was written by one person, who obviously supports the book... but the summaries are useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.33.143 (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant guideline is WP:PEACOCK. --Teratornis (talk) 23:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]